Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.

@article{Skaane2007RandomizedTO,
  title={Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.},
  author={P. Skaane and S. Hofvind and A. Skjennald},
  journal={Radiology},
  year={2007},
  volume={244 3},
  pages={
          708-17
        }
}
  • P. Skaane, S. Hofvind, A. Skjennald
  • Published 2007
  • Medicine
  • Radiology
  • PURPOSE To prospectively compare performance indicators at screen-film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a population-based screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS The regional ethics committee approved the study; informed consent was obtained from patients. Women aged 45-69 years were assigned to undergo SFM (n=16 985) or FFDM (n=6944). Two-view mammograms were interpreted by using independent double reading and a five-point rating scale for probability of… CONTINUE READING
    217 Citations

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    • 73
    • Highly Influenced
    Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study.
    • 64

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
    Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    • 45
    Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
    • 343
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
    • 768
    • Highly Influential
    Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.
    • 259
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme
    • 53