Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.

@article{Skaane2007RandomizedTO,
  title={Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.},
  author={Per Skaane and Solveig Hofvind and Arnulf Skjennald},
  journal={Radiology},
  year={2007},
  volume={244 3},
  pages={
          708-17
        }
}
PURPOSE To prospectively compare performance indicators at screen-film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a population-based screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS The regional ethics committee approved the study; informed consent was obtained from patients. Women aged 45-69 years were assigned to undergo SFM (n=16 985) or FFDM (n=6944). Two-view mammograms were interpreted by using independent double reading and a five-point rating scale for probability of… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 102 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

Full-field digital mammography screening in the population-based screening program in North-Norway: preliminary results [abstr

  • N Bjurstam, JO Frantzen, K Pedersen, S. Hofvind
  • Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North…
  • 2006
2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…