Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions

@article{Farrokhyar2010RandomizedCT,
  title={Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions},
  author={Forough Farrokhyar and Paul Jack Karanicolas and Achilleas Thoma and Marko {\vS}imunovi{\'c} and Mohit Bhandari and Philip J Devereaux and Mehran Anvari and Anthony Adili and Gordon H. Guyatt},
  journal={Annals of Surgery},
  year={2010},
  volume={251},
  pages={409-416}
}
Background and Objectives:Surgical trials pose many methodological challenges often not present in trials of medical interventions. If not properly accounted for, these challenges may introduce significant biases and threaten the validity of the results. Methods:We systematically reviewed the significance of randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of surgical interventions, discussed the methodological challenges encountered in designing and conducting randomized controlled trials of… 
View on Wolters Kluwer
fhs.mcmaster.ca
218 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
7
Background Citations
56
Methods Citations
7
Results Citations
2

218 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial.
Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-sectional Survey.
TLDR
There is much room for improvement concerning the reported designs, conduct, and analysis of surgical RCTs, and some other approaches, such as surgeons' eligibility, performance of pilot studies, or implementation of pragmatic R CTs/expertise-based trials, should be feasibly implemented to overcome the presented challenges.
How to Use a Randomized Clinical Trial Addressing a Surgical Procedure: Users' Guide to the Medical Literature.
TLDR
This Users' Guide to the Medical Literature reviews the use of remote randomization systems, blinding, sham-controlled trials, split-body trials, expertise-based trials, and mechanistic vs practical trials to address risk of bias and applicability issues.
An Overview of Challenges and Approaches to Minimize Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Perioperative Medicine
TLDR
Randomized controlled trials are recognized as the most robust design to study the relationship between exposure and outcomes and achieving adequate statistical power is crucial to producing high quality and meaningful results.
Are randomized clinical trials necessary in cancer surgery
TLDR
The article outlines the main principles of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and discusses various problems related to their organization and performance and is against the overemphasis on randomized trials and the impact factor in clinical practice.
Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review
TLDR
This review summarizes existing expertise- based trials in surgery and related methodological concepts to guide surgeons performing this work and develops the following criteria for surgical expertise for future trials.
Randomised trials in surgery: the burden of evidence.
TLDR
This work examines the limitations of randomised design in skill-dependant interventions in operative surgery and suggests an alternative hierarchy of evidence is warranted in this field.
Blinding in Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials in 2015
  • B. Speich
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Annals of surgery
  • 2017
TLDR
The blinding status was not clearly stated in a large proportion of studies or had sometimes a misleading classification and authors and journals publishing randomized controlled trials should pay attention that status of blinding is unambiguously reported.
PRACTICAL TIPS FOR SURGICAL RESEARCH Why perform a priori sample size calculation ?
TLDR
The importance, concept and methods of a priori sample size calculation (or power analysis) in surgical RCTs are focused on and are equally applied to non-RCT designs.
Mitigating Biases in a Cohort Study: A Critical Examination of the Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis Study
TLDR
The authors focus on the challenges that arise during a surgical trial, including the design, implementation, and methods used to report the clinical evidence, to demonstrate the biases that surgical trials may encounter.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 66 REFERENCES
Blinding of outcomes in trials of orthopaedic trauma: an opportunity to enhance the validity of clinical trials.
TLDR
A systematic review of all randomized controlled trials of orthopaedic trauma published from 1995 to 2004 found investigators have the opportunity to enhance the validity of future clinical trials by incorporating simple blinding techniques.
Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?
Challenges in creating a good randomized controlled trial in hand surgery.
  • A. Thoma
  • Medicine
    Clinics in plastic surgery
  • 2005
The role of the randomized controlled trial in plastic surgery.
Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.
TLDR
There are still very few reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published in leading USA and UK surgical journals, with relatively little difference between these countries in the proportion of reported studies employing these designs.
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials
TLDR
Evidence is presented to support the argument that increased use of the expertise based design will enhance the validity, applicability, feasibility, and ethical integrity of randomised controlled trials in surgery, as well as in other areas.
Ethical framework for the use of sham procedures in clinical trials
TLDR
This work examines the major ethical objections to placebo-controlled procedure trials, including those involving sham surgery, and provides an ethical framework for assessing whether a placebo procedure is ethical to administer in the context of a clinical trial.
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess power and sample size. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy.
TLDR
This work provides a succinct overview of power issues in surgical studies to better equip clinicians to assess the adequacy of a study's sample size and to determine whether its conclusions are valid and can be used to guide surgical practice.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis
  • F. Miller
  • Medicine
    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
  • 2003
TLDR
An ethical analysis is presented that focuses on the methodological rationale for use of sham surgery, risk-benefit assessment, and informed consent and concludes that there are no sound ethical reasons for an absolute prohibition ofSham surgery in clinical trials.
Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions
The quality and quantity of randomised trials of surgical techniques is acknowledged to be limited. According to Peter McCulloch and colleagues, however, some aspects of surgery present special…
...
...