Radical interpretation and the permutation principle

@inproceedings{Jackman1996RadicalIA,
  title={Radical interpretation and the permutation principle},
  author={Henry Jackman},
  year={1996}
}
Davidson has argued1 that there is no fact of the matter as to what any speaker's words refer to because, even holding truth conditions fixed, a radical interpreter will always be able to come up with many equally good interpretations of the interpretee’s language. This conclusion, which Davidson (following Quine) refers to as the "inscrutability of reference", has caused many to reject the radical interpretation methodology as fundamentally flawed.2 Nevertheless, it isn’t clear that such… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

1960).Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Quine, W.V.O. (1990).The Pursuit of Truth

  • W.V.O. Quine
  • 1990

Meaning Truth and Evidence" in Barrett & Gibson (eds.) Perspectives on Quine

  • D. Davidson
  • Philosophical Association,
  • 1990

Indeterminacy, Empiricism and the First Person,

  • J. Searle
  • The Journal of Philosophy
  • 1987

The Refutation of Conventionalism," in his Mind Language and Reality

  • H. Putnam
  • 1975

Reference, Meaning, and Belief,

  • R. Grandy
  • The Journal of Philosophy
  • 1973
2 Excerpts

Individuals. London: Menthuen

  • P. F. Strawson
  • 1959

Substance Without Substrata,

  • N. L. Wilson
  • Review of Metaphysics
  • 1959

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…