Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts

@article{Kastellec2011RacialDA,
  title={Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts},
  author={Jonathan P. Kastellec},
  journal={Law \& Society: Courts eJournal},
  year={2011}
}
This paper evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Because of the small percentage of racial minorities on the federal bench, the key question in evaluating these consequences is not whether minority judges simply vote differently from non-minority judges, but whether their presence on appellate courts influences their colleagues and also affects case outcomes. Using matching methods, I show that black judges are significantly more likely than… Expand
Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges' Sex and Race
Scholars have long sought to resolve whether and to what degree political actor diversity influences the outputs of political institutions like legislatures, administrative agencies, and courts. WhenExpand
Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race
Scholars have long sought to resolve whether and to what degree political actor diversity influences the outputs of political institutions like legislatures, administrative agencies, and courts. WhenExpand
The Voting Behavior of Minority Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
The diversification of the federal courts has led to a number of studies focusing on the voting behavior of African American and, to a lesser extent, Latino judges. Despite expectations that minorityExpand
Race, Context and Judging on the Courts of Appeals: Race-Based Panel Effects in Death Penalty Cases
I examine how the identities of judges on multimember courts interact with case context to influence judicial decision making. Specifically, I leverage variation in panel composition and defendantExpand
Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts
  • M. Sen
  • Psychology
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
  • 2015
I use two newly collected data sets to demonstrate that black federal district judges are consistently overturned on appeal more often than white district judges, with a gap in reversal rates of upExpand
Minority Representation on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Do Foreign-Born Judges Influence Immigration Case Outcomes?
This paper assesses the impacts of minority representation on judicial decisionmaking within three-judge panels on the Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals. While much of the existingExpand
Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from U.S. Circuit Courts
Do gender attitudes influence interactions with female judges in U.S. Circuit Courts? In this paper, we propose a novel judge-specific measure of gender attitudes based on use of gender-stereotypedExpand
Gender, expert advice, and judicial gatekeeping in the United States.
TLDR
Results indicate that the organizational role of trial judge may not be enough to offset the wider effects of the gender system on perceptions of experts, and that women are more likely than men to consider expert advice. Expand
Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies
The extent to which judicial outcomes depend on judges' identities is a central question in multiethnic societies. Past work on the impact of the racial composition of appellate courts has narrowlyExpand
Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges
Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies reveal that several extralegal factors influence judicial decision making. DemographicExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 72 REFERENCES
Impartial Judges? Race, Institutional Context, and U.S. State Supreme Courts
We address a fundamental question in judicial politics: other factors being equal, do African-American judges behave differently than white judges? Many presume that white judges differ from theirExpand
Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making
This article assesses how the institutional context of decision making on three-judge panels of the federal Court of Appeals affects the impact that gender and race have on judicial decisions. OurExpand
Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Do hierarchical politics in the federal judiciary shape collegial politics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals and thus influence judicial voting and case outcomes? I develop a model in which the politicalExpand
Judging the Voting Rights Act
The Voting Rights Act has radically altered the political status of minority voters and dramatically transformed the partisan structure of American politics. Given the political and racial salienceExpand
Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary
Over the past two decades, the United States has seen an intense debate about the composition of the federal judiciary. Are judges "activists"? Should they stop "legislating from the bench"? Are theyExpand
Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes
It is widely believed that the background and worldview of judges influence their decisions. This article uses the fact that judges are assigned their cases randomly to assess the effect of judicialExpand
Panel Composition and Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals over Time
This article investigates two issues unexplored in studies of the relationship between panel composition and voting on three-judge panels of the Courts of Appeals: how often will panel compositionExpand
Indirect Influences of Gender on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Evidence from Sexual Harassment Law
  • 2010
This paper investigates indirect influences of gender diversification on the U.S. Court of Appeals, focusing upon whether and how women influence policy through pathways other than their individualExpand
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND COMPELLING INTERESTS: EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE AT THE CROSSROADS
In the last few years we have witnessed a string of important decisions by the federal courts of appeals addressing the constitutionality of benign, race-conscious governmental actions. Though allExpand
Affirmative Action and Compelling Interests: Equal Protection Jurisprudence at the Corssroads
In the last few years we have witnessed a string of important decisions by the federal courts of appeals addressing the constitutionality of benign, race-conscious governmental actions. Though allExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...