Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct?

@article{Andreasen2000RaceBR,
  title={Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct?},
  author={Robin O. Andreasen},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={2000},
  volume={67},
  pages={S653 - S666}
}
Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social… 

Race: a social destruction of a biological concept

TLDR
It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense, but by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race it is hoped that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.

The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense

TLDR
Many contemporary race scholars reject the biological reality of race, but it is argued that they have been too quick to do so and the possibility that races can be defined cladistically is overlooked.

The Idea of a Scientific Concept of Race

TLDR
The viability of the PRC is shown by demonstrating its capacity to withstand a wide range of objections and a common theme is that the objections turn on misconceptions of the idea of a scientific concept of race.

Racial realism I: Are biological races real?

In this article, I discuss and critique how metaphysicians of race have conceived of and defended racial realism according to how biologists use “race”. I start by defining “racial realism” in the

The Nature of Race: the Genealogy of the Concept and the Biological Construct’s Contemporaneous Utility

Racial constructionists, anti-naturalists, and anti-realists have challenged users of the biological race concept to provide and defend, from the perspective of biology, biological philosophy, and

The Nature of Race

Racial constructionists, anti-naturalists, and anti-realists have challenged users of the biological race concept to provide and defend, from the perspective of biology, biological philosophy, and

Basic Racial Realism

ABSTRACT: In the debate over the reality of race, a three-way dispute has become entrenched: race is biologically real, socially real, or simply not real. These three theses have each enjoyed

The Biological Reification of Race

  • Lisa Gannett
  • Biology
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2004
TLDR
The philosophical analysis of foundational concepts of human population biology such as population, race, and ethnic group is best served by foregoing traditional objectivist approaches for a critical stance that recognises the inextricability of the biological and the social.

Of races: From social constructionism to biological realism

Racial constructionists tend to make three claims about race: (1) races have their origin as social constructs-that races arise at a particular time in history; (2) races were either created with the

Passing, Traveling and Reality: Social Constructionism and the Metaphysics of Race

Among race theorists, the view that race is a social construction is widespread. While the term 'social construction' is sometimes intended to mean merely that race does not (as once believed)
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES

A New Perspective on the Race Debate

TLDR
It is argued that cladism, in conjunction with current work in human evolution, provides a new way to define race biologically, and surprisingly it turns out that cladistic races and social constructivism are compatible.

Racial formation in the United States

INTRODUCTION: Racial Formation in the United States Part I: PARADIGMS OF RACE: eTHNICITY, CLASS, AND NATION 1. Ethnicity 2. Class 3. Nation Part II: RACIAL FORMATION 4. The Theory of Racial Formation

The Plato cult and other philosophical follies

ole Porter and Karl Popper, or the Jazz Age in the philosphy of science philosophy and lunacy, or Nelson Goodman and the omnipotence of words "always apologize, always explain - Robert Nozick's war

A Matter of Individuality

  • D. Hull
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1978
Biological species have been treated traditionally as spatiotemporally unrestricted classes. If they are to perform the function which they do in the evolutionary process, they must be

Naming and Necessity

I hope that some people see some connection between the two topics in the title. If not, anyway, such connections will be developed in the course of these talks. Furthermore, because of the use of

Philosophy of Biology.

What Is Evolutionary Theory? Creationism Fitness The Units of Selection Problem Adaptationism Systematics Sociobiology and the Extension of Evolutionary Theory.

Race and Mixed Race

1 p. abstract. Print (xv, 215 p.) available for circulation through the University of Oregon's Knight Library under the call number: E185.615 .Z33 1993. For more information, visit the publisher's

Evolutionary relationships of human populations on a global scale.

TLDR
A phylogenetic analysis of 26 representative populations from around the world by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method has shown that the first major split of the phylogenetic tree separates Africans from non-Africans and that this split occurs with a 100% bootstrap probability.

Evolution and Classification

TLDR
The following somewhat summary discussion of the causes of the present unsatisfactory condition of botanical knowledge are invited, in the hope that they may be enabled to see how to make some improvement.