RLUIPA is Constitutional

@article{Picarello2004RLUIPAIC,
  title={RLUIPA is Constitutional},
  author={Anthony R. Picarello},
  journal={Planning & Environmental Law},
  year={2004},
  volume={56},
  pages={3 - 7}
}
  • Anthony R. Picarello
  • Published 2004
  • Economics
  • Planning & Environmental Law
    • Although courts have overwhelmingly upheld The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) as constitutional, challenges to the law continue, based mainly on exaggerations and distortions about the law's purpose and effect. 
    View on Taylor & Francis
    1 Citations
    Background Citations
    1
    One Citation
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Is Planning ‘Secular’? Rethinking Religion, Secularism, and Planning
    • 1

    References

    SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
    See Madison v. Riter, 355 F.3d 310 (4th Cir
    • 2003
    See Ehlers-Renzi v. Connelly School of the Holy Child, 224 F
    • 2000
    ) (describing similar challenge to RFRA as "deadly in its implications for religious liberty
    • Mockaitis v. Harcleroad, 104 F.3d 1522
    • 1997
    ) (rejecting Establishment Clause challenge)
      2002) (rejecting Establishment Clause and other challenges, but effectively overruled by Cutter v
        314 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir 2002), cert. denied sub nom
          A-00-10453-RWZ
            See Madison, 355 F
              United States v. Maui, 298 F