• Corpus ID: 10240979

REPLY TO FRANCIS

@inproceedings{Morewedge2014REPLYTF,
  title={REPLY TO FRANCIS},
  author={Carey K. Morewedge and Daniel A. Gilbert and Timothy D. Wilson},
  year={2014}
}
“In numerous one-off critique-articles, Francis presents evidence that individual psychology papers suffer from publication bias, and concludes that the results from these papers ought to be fully ignored. I recently argued the critiques themselves suffer from publication bias and, more importantly, that the recommendation to throw out all data does not follow from the presence of publication bias.” 
Running head: ESTIMATING REPLICABILITY 1 How Replicable is Psychology? Estimating Replicability Based on Test Statistics in Original Studies
In recent years, the replicability of original findings published in psychology journals has been questioned. We show that the replicability of a randomly chosen result cannot exceed population mean
Z-Curve.2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates
Publication bias, the fact that published studies are not necessarily representative of all conducted studies, poses a significant threat to the credibility of scientific literature. To mitigate the

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)
It Does Not Follow
  • U. Simonsohn
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2012
TLDR
Criticism of individual papers through critiques that apply faulty logic to analyses ironically biased by cherry picking is probably counterproductive to their stipulated goal and certainly unfair to the targeted authors.
You Could Have Just Asked
  • Jeff Galak, T. Meyvis
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2012
TLDR
It is suggested that when the answer is out there, it makes more sense to ask for it than to estimate it, and that a meta-analysis of all their studies shows that the effect the authors reported is highly reliable.
The Time Course and Impact of Consumers' Erroneous Beliefs about Hedonic Contrast Effects
Results from four experiments indicate that people expect to enjoy an experience more when it will follow a worse experience. We find that consumers expect hedonic contrast effects even when they do
Reading Fictional Stories and Winning Delayed Prizes: The Surprising Emotional Impact of Distant Events
Hedonic experiences that involve real, immediate events (such as reading about a recent, real-life tragic event) naturally evoke strong affective reactions. When these events are instead fictional or
It does not follow: Evaluating the one-off publication bias critiques by Francis (2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, 2012e, in press)
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 597–599.
  • 2012
More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why affective forecasters overweight probability specifications
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
  • 2014
You could have just asked: Reply to Francis
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • 2012
You could have just asked : Reply to Francis ( 2012 )
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • 2012