Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints

@article{Kaye2003QuestioningAC,
  title={Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints},
  author={David H. Kaye},
  journal={International Statistical Review},
  year={2003},
  volume={71}
}
  • D. Kaye
  • Published 1 December 2003
  • Psychology
  • International Statistical Review
Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with “individualization” often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is… 
A Welcome Exchange on the Scientific Status of Fingerprinting
TLDR
Ten years ago the notion that a top academic journal should publish an exchange on the scientific validation of fingerprint evidence would have been a non-starter, but today scientists, attorneys and others are taking a hard look at the forensic sciences in general and fingerprint evidence in particular.
Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences--fact or fiction?
Is Fingerprint Identification Valid? Rhetorics of Reliability in Fingerprint Proponents’ Discourse
Beginning around 1999, a growing number of scholars have claimed that validation studies for forensic fingerprint identification do not exist. This article revisits that claim by reviewing literature
Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm
TLDR
A formal model for assigning numerical values to configurations of minutiae in fingerprints is described and how the parameters of the model have been optimized to take account of interoperator variability and distortion of the finger pad is described.
Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States
Individualization, the claim to be able to reduce the potential donor pool of a forensic trace to a single source, has long been criticized. This criticism was echoed by a 2009 U.S. National Research
An investigation of fingermark submission decision making
This thesis investigates the submission of fingermark evidence from the fingerprint laboratory (where the enhancement of crime scene fingermarks occurs) to the fingerprint bureau (where examiners
Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science.
Beyond the individuality of fingerprints: a measure of simulated computer latent print source attribution accuracy
TLDR
Three experiments that measure the accuracy of a computer fingerprint matcher at identifying the source of simulated latent prints suggest that measuring the accuracy and potential for erroneous conclusions for AFISs might provide a basis for comparison between human examiners and automated systems at performing various identification tasks.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
The Nonscience of Fingerprinting: United States v. Llera-Plaza
This article discusses the district court’s change of heart in United States v. Llera-Plaza. In this case, U.S. District Judge Louis Pollak initially excluded testimony of a “match” or
Is Science Different for Lawyers?
Courts are obligated to evaluate the basis for proffered expert opinion to determine whether it is reliable and valid. This gate-keeping requirement compels them to review a wide variety of
On the individuality fingerprints
TLDR
The results show that: (i) fingerprint matching is not infallible and leads to some false associations, (ii) the performance of automatic fingerprint matcher does not even come close to the theoretical performance, and (iii) due to the limited information content of the minutiae-based representation, automatic system designers should explore the use of non-minutiae based information present in the fingerprints.
Evaluation of Physical Evidence in Criminalistics: Subjective or Objective Process
TLDR
James W. Osterburg, M.P.A. is Professor of Police Administration, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, and president of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences.
DNA Evidence: Probability, Population Genetics, and the Courts
To help meet the challenge of presenting properly performed DNA tests within the post-Daubert legal framework, this article outlines the statistical procedures that have been employed or proposed to
Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom
TLDR
This book explains the strength of evidence in the case as a whole and explains the implications for the legal system in the light of the alternative Hypothesis.
An introduction to forensic DNA analysis
TLDR
A short history of DNA TYPING and its applications, including the Frye Standard and the Federal Rules of Evidence RFLP PCR and the State of the Debate.
Interpapillary lines--the variable part of the human fingerprint.
TLDR
The fact that interpapillary lines are more frequently found on the right hands in men and those with increasing age is consistent with the theory that they correspond to degenerative changes and with sensitivity of touch.
Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists
TLDR
This book discusses uncertainty in forensic science, the evaluation of evidence, and the role of Bayesian inference in the interpretation of evidence.
The use of statistics in forensic science
Probability populations and samples weight of evidence and the Bayesian likelihood ratio transfer evidence application of statistics to particular areas of forensic science knowledge-based systems
...
...