Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions

@article{Lee1956QuestionOP,
  title={Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions},
  author={T. D. Lee and Chen Ning Yang},
  journal={Physical Review},
  year={1956},
  volume={104},
  pages={254-258}
}
The question of parity conservation in β decays and in hyperon and meson decays is examined. Possible experiments are suggested which might test parity conservation in these interactions. 
Physics of heavy quark decays and CP violation
The phenomena of quark mixing in weak interaction are described. The current experimental status of the mixing matrix, charm and beauty particle decays, and C? violations are reported. Future
CP Violation in Σ0 decay
The non-trivial structure of the QCD vacuum gives rise to a P and CP violating term in the QCD Lagrangian. The fact that we do not see an observable CP violation in the strong interaction despite t
CP violation in kaon decays
We review the Standard Model predictions of CP violation in kaon decays. We present an elementary introduction to Chiral Perturbation Theory, four-quark effective Hamiltonians and the relation among
Tests of P-violation in neutron and nuclear beta decay
An overview is given of the present status of parity violation tests in neutron decay and nuclear beta decay. Prospects for improved and new measurements are discussed as well.
2pi Decay of the K Meson without CP Violation
It is shown that assuming mixed-quark states in hadrons suggests that the two pion decay of the long-lived neutral kaon may be described without CP violation. The rate of this decay relative to the
Selection rules in the one K meson theory
The selection rules of the annihilation of nucleonantinucleon pairs and the K decay in pions are investigated. The process of the nucleon-antinucleon annihilation is dependent on the parity singlet
Phenomenology of Weak Interactions
In 1933 Fermi postulated the existence of the neutrino to explain the continuous energy spectrum observed in β-decay1).
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
Appendix 1, both amplitudes should start with I (Z+ia)/2Ej' instead of (Z+y)/2Z, and a missing exponent rs should be inserted in the second $(E IJ)/(E+IJ)fl o— f the equation for A3
  • Appendix 1, both amplitudes should start with I (Z+ia)/2Ej' instead of (Z+y)/2Z, and a missing exponent rs should be inserted in the second $(E IJ)/(E+IJ)fl o— f the equation for A3
  • 1956
The definition of the Dirac quantum number I(: following Eq. (64) should read i~= (j — I) (2j+1)
  • The definition of the Dirac quantum number I(: following Eq. (64) should read i~= (j — I) (2j+1)
  • 1957
On page 548, an extra term g&'& should be added to the right-hand side of (2. '7) On page 552
  • On page 548, an extra term g&'& should be added to the right-hand side of (2. '7) On page 552