• DOI:10.1515/9783110208603.1.87
• Corpus ID: 14550086

Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: examples from Scottish English

@inproceedings{Scobbie2008QuasiphonemicCA,
  title={Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: examples from Scottish English},
  author={James M. Scobbie and Jane Stuart-Smith},
  year={2008}
}

• J. Scobbie, J. Stuart-Smith
• Published 2008
• Linguistics

In this article we propose that contrast must be treated as a gradient phenomenon at the phonological level, with membership of a phonemic inventory being a matter of
degree. This is because, though minimal pairs provide simple and strong evidence of contrast, things are not always so straightforward. Defining “minimal” is one
challenge; as is determining which aspects of a contrast are distinctive and which redundant. Non-phonological information is sometimes a necessary consideration.
These complications are usually thought to affect the analysis of a phenomenon in a discrete way, tipping the binary balance held by the phonologist towards either one
analysis or another. We, on the other hand, see the necessity of evaluating contrastive evidence and of taking other linguistic information into account as being an indication that contrastiveness is a scalar property. We address some patterns in the sound system of Scottish English; ones which provide less than clear evidence of
phonemicity — or, as we think, evidence of less than clear phonemicity.