Quantum states and generalized observables: a simple proof of Gleason's theorem.

@article{Busch2003QuantumSA,
  title={Quantum states and generalized observables: a simple proof of Gleason's theorem.},
  author={P. Busch},
  journal={Physical review letters},
  year={2003},
  volume={91 12},
  pages={
          120403
        }
}
  • P. Busch
  • Published 2003
  • Mathematics, Physics, Medicine
  • Physical review letters
A quantum state can be understood in a loose sense as a map that assigns a value to every observable. Formalizing this characterization of states in terms of generalized probability distributions on the set of effects, we obtain a simple proof of the result, analogous to Gleason's theorem, that any quantum state is given by a density operator. As a corollary we obtain a von Neumann-type argument against noncontextual hidden variables. It follows that on an individual interpretation of quantum… Expand

Topics from this paper

A Gleason-Type Theorem for Any Dimension Based on a Gambling Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
Based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics, we derive a Gleason-type theorem that holds for any dimension n of a quantum system, and in particular for $$n=2$$n=2. The theorem states thatExpand
A Generalization of Gleason's Frame Function for Quantum Measurement
The goal is to extend Gleason's notion of a frame function, which is essential in his fundamental theorem in quantum measurement, to a more general function acting on 1-tight, so-called, ParsevalExpand
Algebraic probability-theoretic characterization of quantum correlations
  • B. Yan
  • Physics, Mathematics
  • 2017
Quantum entanglement and nonlocality are inequivalent notions: There exist entangled states that nevertheless admit local-realistic interpretations. This paper studies a special class ofExpand
Unified framework for correlations in terms of local quantum observables.
TLDR
If the theory is such that all local quantum measurements are possible, one obtains the correlations corresponding to the extension of Gleason's Theorem to multipartite systems, and it is proved the existence of a gap for three or more parties. Expand
Gleason-Type Theorem for Projective Measurements, Including Qubits: The Born Rule Beyond Quantum Physics
Born’s quantum probability rule is traditionally included among the quantum postulates as being given by the squared amplitude projection of a measured state over a prepared state, or else as a traceExpand
Information-theoretic interpretation of quantum formalism
TLDR
It is concluded that quantum information, although dramatically expanding the scope of classical information, is not different from the information itself and is therefore a universal tool of reasoning. Expand
Local quantum measurement and no-signaling imply quantum correlations.
We show that, assuming that quantum mechanics holds locally, the finite speed of information is the principle that limits all possible correlations between distant parties to be quantum mechanical asExpand
A foundation of quantum mechanics based on focusing and symmetry
A new foundation of quantum mechanics for systems symmetric under a compact symmetry group is proposed. The foundation is given by a link to classical statistics and coupled to the concept ofExpand
Extended statistical modeling under symmetry; the link toward quantum mechanics
We derive essential elements of quantum mechanics from a parametric structure extending that of traditional mathematical statistics. The basic setting is a set A of incompatible experiments, and aExpand
The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are operationally redundant
TLDR
The mathematical structure of quantum measurements and the Born rule are usually imposed as axioms; the authors show instead that they are the only possible measurement postulates, if the authors require that arbitrary partitioning of systems does not change the theory’s predictions. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

Interpreting the Quantum World
Introduction 1. From classical to quantum mechanics 2. Bell's 'no-go' theorem 3. The Kochen and Specker 'no-go' theorem 4. The proof of interpretation 5. Quantum mechanics without observers: I 6.Expand