Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale With Automated Data Extraction

@article{Feldman2019QuantifyingSB,
  title={Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale With Automated Data Extraction},
  author={Sergey Feldman and Waleed Ammar and Kyle Lo and Elly Trepman and Madeleine van Zuylen and Oren Etzioni},
  journal={JAMA Network Open},
  year={2019},
  volume={2}
}
Importance Analyses of female representation in clinical studies have been limited in scope and scale. [...] Key MethodDesign, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, clinical studies from published articles from PubMed from 1966 to 2018 and records from Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov from 1999 to 2018 were identified.Expand
Analysis of Female Enrollment and Participant Sex by Burden of Disease in US Clinical Trials Between 2000 and 2020
TLDR
This study’s findings suggest that sex bias persists within clinical trials, with male and female participants underrepresented in different areas of research. Expand
Sex bias in surgical research
TLDR
Transformation of research to improve the health of all people will remain limited until these sex-biased practices are abolished, and progress has been made resulting in better female participation in clinical trials. Expand
Representation of Women in Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta‐Analysis
TLDR
The proportion of women in cardiac surgery trials is low and likely inadequate to provide meaningful estimates of the treatment effect, according to a systematic evaluation of cardiac surgery RCTs published in the past 2 decades. Expand
The role of sex and gender in the selection of Alzheimer patients for clinical trial pre-screening
TLDR
The large number of low-educated elderly women with AD demands for a sex-focused approach in clinical research, and new assessment tools insensitive to education level should be developed to enable a proportional representation of women. Expand
Large-Scale Labeling and Assessment of Sex Bias in Publicly Available Expression Data
TLDR
Training organism-specific models to infer sample sex from gene expression data and using entity normalization to map metadata cell line and drug mentions to existing ontologies allow for expression-based sex labels, which allow for further examine the complexity of cell line sex and assess the frequency of metadata sex label misannotations. Expand
Harnessing the Power of Sex Differences: What a Difference Ten Years Did Not Make
TLDR
Little progress has been made across the last ten years in harnessing the power that sex differences can afford in research for discovery and therapeutic potential for neurological and psychiatric disease to improve the health of men, women and gender diverse individuals. Expand
Sex-Based Differences in Autologous Cell Therapy Trials in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Subanalysis of the ACCRUE Database
TLDR
Sex differences were found in baseline cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac function and in outcome responses to cell therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction randomized to autologous cell-based or control treatment. Expand
Quantifying 60 Years of Gender Bias in Biomedical Research with Word Embeddings
TLDR
Overall, it is found that traditional gender stereotypes have reduced over time in biomedical research, but the embeddings of many medical conditions are as biased today as they were 60 years ago. Expand
State of the evidence: a survey of global disparities in clinical trials
TLDR
A comprehensive global study investigating the number of randomised controlled trials published on different health conditions, and how this compares with the global disease burden that they impose, finds research priorities are not well optimized to reduce the global burden of disease. Expand
Large-scale labeling and assessment of sex bias in publicly available expression data
TLDR
In conclusion, the results demonstrate limited overall sex bias, while highlighting high bias in specific subfields and underscoring the importance of including sex labels to better understand the underlying biology. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
Gender bias in clinical trials: do double standards still apply?
TLDR
The NIH Revitalization Act does not appear to have improved gender-balanced enrollment or promoted the use of gender-specific analyses in clinical trials published in an influential medical journal. Expand
Is there still gender bias in nursing research? An update.
TLDR
The bias against male participants was consistent across studies differing in methods, specialty areas, funding, and sample characteristics; studies with male first authors, however, were significantly less likely to have biased samples. Expand
Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress?
TLDR
The current level of compliance with guidelines for the inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in federally funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is compared to that from 2004. Expand
Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex.
TLDR
Survey of research articles published in major medical journals shows the need for increased awareness and monitoring of recruitment and retention of women in clinical research and for analysis of data by sex of the subjects to be carried out consistently. Expand
Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.
TLDR
Inadequate compliance with NIH-funded clinical trials requires women and minorities as subjects to be included, and the findings illustrate inadequate compliance with the NIH guidelines. Expand
Sex Bias in Hand Surgery Research.
TLDR
This review investigated the recent hand surgery literature to assess for equity in inclusion of both sexes in research as well as whether outcomes were analyzed based on sex. Expand
Under-representation of women and ethnic minorities in vascular surgery randomized controlled trials.
TLDR
Minority ethnicity and female gender are under-reported and under-represented in vascular surgery RCTs, particularly in small, non-government-funded and single-center trials. Expand
Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
TLDR
The overall enrollment rate for women exceeded the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in women in the general population and increased over time and the data according to the sex-specific prevalence of disease and assessed changes in enrollment over time. Expand
Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses
Objective To evaluate the frequency, validity, and relevance of statistically significant (P<0.05) sex-treatment interactions in randomized controlled trials in Cochrane meta-analyses. DesignExpand
Women encounter ADRs more often than do men
TLDR
The data confirm the higher risk of ADRs among female subjects compared with a male cohort and identify gender-specific differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of drugs as an explanation. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...