Corpus ID: 62028837

Quantifying Losses in Power Systems Using Different Types of FACTS Controllers

@inproceedings{Maddela2013QuantifyingLI,
  title={Quantifying Losses in Power Systems Using Different Types of FACTS Controllers},
  author={Gopiram Maddela},
  year={2013}
}
This thesis discusses the placement of conventional power flow controllers (namely the Fixed series capacitor (FSC), Phase Angle Regulating Transformer (PAR)) and Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices (namely the Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC), the Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC), the Unified Power Flow Controllers (UPFC) and the Sen Transformer (ST)) in bulk power systems to minimize transmission losses in the entire system. This firstly resolves line… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Facts about flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) controllers: Practical installations and benefits
This paper presents various facts related to the landmark development: practical installations, benefits and application of FACTS controllers in the electric utilities. The history of development ofExpand
All nodes voltage regulation and line loss minimization in loop distribution systems using UPFC
Voltage regulation and line loss minimization in distribution lines are challenging problems, particularly when it is not economic to upgrade the entire feeder system. This paper presents a newExpand
Selection of TCSC parameters: Capacitor and inductor
Thyristor controlled series compensator (TCSC) device is a series compensator to govern the power flow by compensating the reactance of the transmission line. Both capacitive and inductive reactanceExpand
Advantages of voltage sourced converter (VSC) based design concepts for FACTS and HVDC-link applications
  • G. Reed, R. Pape, M. Takeda
  • Engineering
  • 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)
  • 2003
The application of FACTS and HVDC technologies, in the form of voltage sourced converter (VSC) based designs; continue to be implemented throughout North America and other parts of the world forExpand
Comparison of the 'Sen' transformer with the unified power flow controller
  • K. K. Sen, M. L. Sen
  • Engineering
  • 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)
  • 2003
The independent control of active and reactive power flow in a transmission line is necessary for the transfer of bulk power along a desired path in the most economical way. A 'Sen' transformer (ST)Expand
Capacitor placement in radial distribution systems for loss reduction
Reduction of I/sup 2/R loss in distribution systems is very essential to improve the overall efficiency of power delivery. The I/sup 2/R loss can be separated into two parts based on the active andExpand
Allocation of FACTS devices in hydrothermal systems
This work presents a methodology to represent and analyze the influence of FACTS (flexible AC transmission systems) devices on the multiperiod economic dispatch problem. Two FACTS devices areExpand
Optimal Control of Reactive Power flow for Improvements in Voltage Profiles and for Real Power Loss Minimization
A mathematical formulation of the optimal reactive power control (optimal VAR control) problem and results from tests of the algorithm are presented in this paper. The model minimizes the real powerExpand
Optimal location of FACTS devices to enhance power system security
This paper compares three heuristic methods (SA, TS and GA) applied to the optimal location of FACTS devices in a power system. The optimizations are made on three parameters: the location of theExpand
Applications of modelling UPFC into multi-machine power systems
The paper establishes a non-linear dynamic model of a multi-machine power system with a unified power flow controller (UPFC) installed. The linearised Phillips-Heffron model of the system is thenExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...