Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline.

@article{Pouwels2016QualityOR,
  title={Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline.},
  author={Koen B Pouwels and Niken N. Widyakusuma and Rolf H. H. Groenwold and Eelko Hak},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2016},
  volume={69},
  pages={
          217-24
        }
}
OBJECTIVES Poor quality of reporting of confounding has been observed in observational studies prior the STrenghtening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, a reporting guideline for observational studies. We assessed whether the reporting of confounding improved after the STROBE statement. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We searched MEDLINE for all articles about observational cohort and case-control studies on interventions with a hypothesized beneficial effect… CONTINUE READING
1
Twitter Mention

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 CITATIONS

ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE

VIEW 2 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND

PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.

  • International journal of technology assessment in health care
  • 2018
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES