Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

@article{Rex2002QualityIT,
  title={Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer},
  author={Douglas K. Rex and John H. Bond and Sidney J. Winawer and Theodore R. Levin and Randall W. Burt and David A. Johnson and Lynne M Kirk and Scott Litlin and David A. Lieberman and Jerome D. Waye and James M. Church and John B. Marshall and Robert H Riddell},
  journal={American Journal of Gastroenterology},
  year={2002},
  volume={97},
  pages={1296-1308}
}
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer 

Tables from this paper

Quality in colonoscopy: European perspectives and practice

TLDR
The key components of a high quality colonoscopy are discussed, methods for improving quality, emerging technologies that have the potential to improve quality are reviewed and areas for future work are highlighted.

Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Quality in Colonoscopy: Cecal Intubation First, Then What?

  • D. Rex
  • Medicine
    The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • 2006
TLDR
Evidence is reviewed suggesting that after cecal intubation rates, two quality indicators should be the priorities for the CQI process for colonoscopy: measurement of individual endoscopists' adenoma detection rates and recommended intervals for postpolypectomy surveillance Colonoscopy.

Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form

TLDR
A competency‐based colonoscopy assessment form that would be easy to use, suitable for the assessment of junior and senior endoscopists and potentially a useful instrument to detect differences in performance standards following different training interventions is developed.

Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance

TLDR
The medical literature describes disparity in colonoscopy performance with respect to polyp detection, caecal intubation rates and procedural times.

Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time

In 2002, a U.S. Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommended that the withdrawal phase for colonoscopy should average at least 6–10 min. This was based on 10 consecutive colonoscopies by

Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators

TLDR
The scientific basis for each of the quality measures published in the UK standards for colorectal cancer screening are reviewed.

Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rates: Outcomes of quality improvement program

TLDR
The outcome of providing quarterly and monthly feedback on colonoscopy quality measures was measured as part of a quality improvement program.

Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards

  • P. RajasekharM. Rutter C. Rees
  • Medicine
    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
  • 2012
TLDR
Assessment of the performance of colonoscopy in endoscopy units in the northeast of England found that consistency in CIR and ADR has been demonstrated but comparison between individuals and units is difficult.

Quality Criteria for a Good Screening Colonoscopy

TLDR
The criteria that serve as benchmarks for a good screening colonoscopy are discussed, taking into account procedural details, colonoscopist skills, and accreditation.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 116 REFERENCES

Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology

In conjunction with ACG Consumer Brochure: “ACG Recommendations on Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average and Higher Risk Patients in Clinical Practice”.

Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy.

TLDR
Screening colonoscopy can be safely performed in an office facility and Physician time with the patient should be limited to allow a low cost that compares favorably with screening costs for other malignancies.

Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Flexible Endoscopy and Polypectomy: A Case-Control Study of 32 702 Veterans

TLDR
The study compared the frequency with which flexible endoscopies were done during the period preceding the first diagnosis of cancer among patients with colorectal cancer and among controls without cancer to show that these procedures actually do reduce the risk for cancer in the large intestine.

Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in the Federal Republic of Germany. Results of an inquiry.

TLDR
It was shown on the basis of the survey that a good, standardized training of the endoscopist, the strict observance of the contraindications, the non-use of analgesics and general anaesthesia, fluoroscopic control of "difficult" colons and the use of the best instruments and aids presently available, reduce the complication rate to a minimum.

Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.

TLDR
Endoscopic screening examination with polypectomy and follow-up was shown to reduce the incidence of CRC in a Norwegian normal population and the possible effect of screening on overall mortality should be addressed in larger studies.

Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.

  • D. Rex
  • Medicine
    The American journal of gastroenterology
  • 1995
TLDR
Prospective studies indicate that nonbleeding colonic symptoms have a substantially lower yield for cancer than bleeding symptoms, and cancer yields for postpolypectomy surveillance should improve with implementation of new surveillance guidelines, with little or no impact on mortality.

Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.

Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy.

TLDR
It is concluded that an experienced colonoscopist will miss about 15% of colorectal neoplastic polyps less than 10 mm in size in the setting of adequate bowel preparation.
...