Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.

@article{Elangovan2013QualityAO,
  title={Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.},
  author={Satheesh Elangovan and Gustavo Avila-Ortiz and Georgia K. Johnson and Nadeem Yakub Karimbux and Veerasathpurush Allareddy},
  journal={Journal of periodontology},
  year={2013},
  volume={84 2},
  pages={
          176-85
        }
}
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews represent the highest form of evidence in the current hierarchy of evidence-based dentistry. Critical analysis of published systematic reviews may help to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and to identify areas that need future improvement. The aim of this overview is to determine and compare the quality of systematic reviews published in the field of periodontal regeneration using established checklists, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews… CONTINUE READING
BETA
3
Twitter Mentions

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES

Successful regeneration of mandibular Class II furcation defects: an evidence-based treatment approach.

  • The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry
  • 1995
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Value of grey literature to scholarly research in the digital age

R. Huffine
  • Available at: http://www.elsevier. com/framework_librarians/Docs/2010RichardHuffine. pdf. Accessed December
  • 2011

Value of grey literature to scholarly research in the digital age

R. Huffine
  • Available at: http://www.elsevier. com/framework_librarians/Docs/2010RichardHuffine. pdf. Accessed December
  • 2011

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…