• Corpus ID: 61063260

Qualitative methods in information retrieval research.

  title={Qualitative methods in information retrieval research.},
  author={Raya Fidel},
  journal={Library \& Information Science Research},
  • R. Fidel
  • Published 1993
  • Sociology
  • Library & Information Science Research
This review of the literature shows that the number of research projects in information retrieval (IR) that employ qualitative methods is on the rise. Although no agreed-upon definition exists for the concept qualitative research, a number of typical characteristics describe its nature. Qualitative research is noncontrolling, holistic and case oriented, about processes, open and flexible, diverse in methods, humanistic, inductive, and scientific. Although these characteristics make qualitative… 
An argument for the increased use of qualitative research in LIS
The analysis has led to the conclusion that there is a greater inclination towards some qualitative methods than others and that research problems should be redesigned and explored from different perspectives so that new paradigmatic questions can be raised.
Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis
It is shown that LIS scholars utilize a greater number and wider variety of research methods than before, and content analysis, experiment, and theoretical approach have become the top choices of research method selection and implementation in the field.
Recent Library Practitioner Research: A Methodological Analysis and Critique
Every few years library and information science (LIS) scholars report on the state of research in librarianship in general and practitioner research in particular. These reviews, some more extensive
A memo of qualitative research for information science: toward theory construction
A tighter and long‐term investment of information science in qualitative research and the formation of the information science's own theorists and theory‐illumined practitioners is suggested.
Qualitative methodologies are growing in importance for library and information science researchers. In this article, we note an unfortunate antiscientific bias in contemporary writings that proclaim
Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research
  • Lai Ma
  • Computer Science
    J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2012
Three formal ontological categories are introduced for deconstructing the polarized view of reality in objectivism and relativism and for differentiating the nature and characteristics of objective, subjective, and normative validity claims as well as the conditions for justifying “objectivity” in social research.