Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution

@article{Shtulman2006QualitativeDB,
  title={Qualitative differences between na{\"i}ve and scientific theories of evolution},
  author={Andrew Shtulman},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},
  year={2006},
  volume={52},
  pages={170-194}
}
  • Andrew Shtulman
  • Published 2006
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophers of biology have long argued that Darwin's theory of evolution was qualitatively different from all earlier theories of evolution. Whereas Darwin's predecessors and contemporaries explained adaptation as the transformation of a species' "essence," Darwin explained adaptation as the selective propagation of randomly occurring mutations within a population. The present study explored the possibility of a parallel between early "transformational" theories of evolution and modern naïve… CONTINUE READING
    237 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    The Relation Between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning
    • 143
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution
    • A. Mesoudi
    • Geography, Medicine
    • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • 2017
    • 50
    • PDF
    Tuition vs. Intuition: Effects of Instruction on Naïve Theories of Evolution
    • 41
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
    • PDF
    The Stagnancy of Family Studies in Modern Academia: Resistances Toward the Integration of Evolutionary Theory
    • 9
    Understanding of Evolution May Be Improved by Thinking about People
    • D. Nettle
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    • 2010
    • 31
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF