Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution.

Abstract

Philosophers of biology have long argued that Darwin's theory of evolution was qualitatively different from all earlier theories of evolution. Whereas Darwin's predecessors and contemporaries explained adaptation as the transformation of a species' "essence," Darwin explained adaptation as the selective propagation of randomly occurring mutations within a… (More)

Topics

10 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0510'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18
Citations per Year

63 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 63 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Shtulman2006QualitativeDB, title={Qualitative differences between na{\"{i}ve and scientific theories of evolution.}, author={Andrew Shtulman}, journal={Cognitive psychology}, year={2006}, volume={52 2}, pages={170-94} }