Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning.

@article{Jimnez2006QualitativeDB,
  title={Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning.},
  author={Luis Jim{\'e}nez and Joaqu{\'i}n M M Vaquero and Juan Lupi{\'a}{\~n}ez},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition},
  year={2006},
  volume={32 3},
  pages={
          475-90
        }
}
Four experiments investigate the differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning concerning their resilience to structural and superficial task changes. A superficial change that embedded the SRT task in the context of a selection task, while maintaining the sequence, did selectively hinder the expression of implicit learning. In contrast, a manipulation that maintained the task surface, but decreased the sequence validity, affected the expression of learning specifically when it… 

Figures from this paper

Implicit probabilistic sequence learning is independent of explicit awareness.

Investigation of the effect of explicit knowledge on implicit learning was investigated using a modified version of the ASRT task, a probabilistic sequence learning paradigm that yields continuous and relatively pure measures of implicit learning, to indicate that implicit sequence learning occurs independently of explicitknowledge.

Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources.

Sequence learning and contextual cueing explore different forms of implicit learning, arising from practice with a structured serial task, or with a search task with informative contexts. We assess

Asymmetrical effects of control on the expression of implicit sequence learning

The hypothesis that transfer is specifically hindered by those changes that increase the control demands required by the orienting task with respect to those faced over training is assessed.

Asymmetrical effects of control on the expression of implicit sequence learning

As an automatic process, implicit learning effects have been characterized as inflexible and largely tied to the reinstatement of the acquisition context. However, implicit learning transfer has been

Implicit sequence learning in a search task

Results are consistent with the claims that implicit and explicit learning are mixed in this central condition and that implicit learning is not affected by selection difficulty.

On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences.

The results suggest that the mechanisms involved in transient shifts in conflict-specific control, as reflected in sequential congruency effects, are also engaged when the source of conflict is implicit.

Context dependent learning in the serial RT task

It is proposed either that incidental stimulus features are integrated with a global sequence representation, or that the changed context causes participants to strategically inhibit sequence skills.

Representing serial action and perception

It is suggested that sequence learning is not predetermined with respect to one particular type of information but, rather, develops according to an overall principle of activation contingent on task characteristics.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES

The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development

In the experiment reported here, participants learned a motor sequencing task either implicitly or explicitly, and participants with explicit training showed sequence knowledge equivalent to those with implicit training, implying that implicit knowledge had been acquired in parallel with explicit knowledge.

Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.

These studies investigated the unconfounding of learning of simple frequency information from complex structure during sequenced serial reaction time (RT) trials. Experiment 1 demonstrated that

Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.

The authors demonstrate that even when task and stimulus structure are held constant, subjects react to variations in incidental stimulus properties by processing the stimuli in qualitatively different ways, suggesting implicit learning, just like explicit learning, proceeds through active organization of the stimulus complex.

Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning

I agree with Dienes and Berry’s (1997) and Neal and Hesketh’s (1997) call for investigations of the qualitative differences between implicit and explicit learning and note that such investigations

Episodic knowledge and implicit learning

Despite nearly 20 years of controversy, researchers are still divided over the contributions of abstract and episodic knowledge to performance on implicit learning tasks, and whether these types of

Implicit learning of complex structures: active adaptation and selective processing in acquisition and application

It is demonstrated that what subjects learn implicitly about the structure of a domain critically depends on decisions they make about how to organize the structural components, and proposed a synthesis, in which learning is understood through a common set of principles.

Implicit learning.

  • C. Seger
  • Psychology, Biology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1994
The dependence of implicit learning on particular brain areas is discussed, some conclusions are drawn for modeling implicit learning, and the interaction of implicit and explicit learning is considered.

Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold

It is argued that construing the implicit nature of implicit learning in terms of a subjective threshold is most likely to prove fruitful for future research, and the subjective threshold criterion may demarcate qualitatively different types of knowledge.

On the development of procedural knowledge.

A subgroup of subjects showed substantial procedural learning of the sequence in the absence of explicit declarative knowledge of it, and their ability to generate the sequence was effectively at chance and showed no savings in learning.

Learning the structure of event sequences.

A connectionist model that incorporates sensitivity to the sequential structure and to priming effects is shown to capture key aspects of both acquisition and processing and to account for the interaction between attention and sequence structure reported by Cohen, Ivry, and Keele (1990).