Corpus ID: 26820338

QWERTY vs . Dvorak Efficiency : A Computational Approach

@inproceedings{Torres2013QWERTYV,
  title={QWERTY vs . Dvorak Efficiency : A Computational Approach},
  author={Ricard Torres},
  year={2013}
}
After David’s pioneering contribution, many authors have claimed that the prevalence of the QWERTY keyboard layout is an instance of lock-in on an inferior technology, because the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is more efficient. But other authors, notably Liebowitz and Margolis, have disputed this claim. Here we proceed to examine the relative efficiency of the two layouts by computational means. The result is that Dvorak is actually more efficient than QWERTY. Our computations depend on a… Expand

Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES
The Fable of the Keys
  • 768
  • PDF
QWERTY, @, &, #
  • M. Castillo
  • Medicine
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • 2011
  • 3
  • PDF
Rerun the tape of history and QWERTY always wins
  • 36
  • Highly Influential
The Quest for QWERTY
  • 37
  • PDF
Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events
  • 3,477
Network externality : an uncommon tragedy
  • 1,037
  • Highly Influential
Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
  • 1,459
Clio and the Economics of QWERTY
  • 5,548
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
...
1
2
...