Corpus ID: 26820338

QWERTY vs . Dvorak Efficiency : A Computational Approach

@inproceedings{Torres2013QWERTYV,
  title={QWERTY vs . Dvorak Efficiency : A Computational Approach},
  author={Ricard Torres},
  year={2013}
}
  • Ricard Torres
  • Published 2013
  • After David’s pioneering contribution, many authors have claimed that the prevalence of the QWERTY keyboard layout is an instance of lock-in on an inferior technology, because the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is more efficient. But other authors, notably Liebowitz and Margolis, have disputed this claim. Here we proceed to examine the relative efficiency of the two layouts by computational means. The result is that Dvorak is actually more efficient than QWERTY. Our computations depend on a… CONTINUE READING

    Tables from this paper.

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES
    The Fable of the Keys
    • 753
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    QWERTY, @, &, #
    • M. Castillo
    • Medicine
    • American Journal of Neuroradiology
    • 2011
    • 3
    • PDF
    Rerun the tape of history and QWERTY always wins
    • 35
    • Highly Influential
    The Quest for QWERTY
    • 35
    • PDF
    Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events
    • 3,312
    • PDF
    Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy
    • 1,014
    • Highly Influential
    Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
    • 1,527
    Clio and the Economics of QWERTY
    • 5,313
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF