Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process

@article{Botelho2017PursuingQH,
  title={Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process},
  author={Tristan L. Botelho and Mabel Abraham},
  journal={Administrative Science Quarterly},
  year={2017},
  volume={62},
  pages={698 - 730}
}
Despite lab-based evidence supporting the argument that double standards—by which one group is unfairly held to stricter standards than another—explain observed gender differences in evaluations, it remains unclear whether double standards also affect evaluations in organization and market contexts, where competitive pressures create a disincentive to discriminate. Using data from a field study of investment professionals sharing recommendations on an online platform, and drawing on status… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Female Penalty for Novelty and the Offsetting Effect of Alternate Status Characteristics

TLDR
This study builds on theories of uncertainty and status signaling to identify contingencies in women’s work that penalize novelty but also shows that such penalty may vary.

Taking a Pass: How Proportional Prejudice and Decisions Not to Hire Reproduce Gender Segregation1

The authors propose and test a novel theory of how decisions not to hire reproduce gender segregation through what they term proportional prejudice. They hypothesize that employers are less likely to

Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs

While most research explaining the persistence of gender inequality has focused on how decision makers’ own biases perpetuate inequities, a growing body of work points to mechanisms of bias that may

The Importance of Gender Congruence in Corporate Social Responsibility: Field Experimental Evidence of Applicant Interest

Labor market scholars have made recent calls for moving beyond demand-side explanations for observed labor market outcomes and for uncovering supply-side processes and the interaction between these.

Unwelcome voices: The gender bias‐mitigating potential of unconventionality

TLDR
It is predicted that in terms of how audiences rate the quality of a project, “unconventional” projects are less susceptible to gender bias.

Rewarding Numbers: Quantification Premia and Evaluative Convergence

The author advances the theory that when evaluation bears high stakes and is subject to high uncertainty of quality, a greater presence of numbers in the evaluated materials positively influences the

Taking a Pass: How Proportional Prejudice and Decisions Not to Hire Reproduce Sex Segregation

We propose and test a theory of how decisions not to hire reproduce sex segregation through what we term proportional prejudice. We hypothesize that employers are less likely to hire anyone when the

The Disciplining Effect of Status: Evaluator Status Awards and Observed Gender Bias in Evaluations

We theorize that status awards will have a disciplining effect on evaluators, changing how they evaluate. Specifically, status awards will lead evaluators to place less weight on unreliable

Gender and quality signals: How does gender influence the effectiveness of signals in crowdfunding?

  • Yin-Chi Liao
  • Business
    Journal of Small Business Management
  • 2021
ABSTRACT Combining signaling theory and gender role congruity theory, this study examines if the quality signals of entrepreneurs and their ventures are perceived differently because of their gender,

Does Investor Gender Matter for the Success of Female Entrepreneurs? Gender Homophily and the Stigma of Incompetence in Entrepreneurial Finance

Female support of other women has been put forth as a remedy to the gender gap across many domains. Yet the potential costs associated with gender homophily are not well understood. We propose that
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES

Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers1

TLDR
It is shown that gender, race, and nationality differences continue to affect salary growth after performance ratings are taken into account, ceteris paribus, demonstrating a critical challenge faced by the many contemporary employers who adopt merit‐based practices and policies.

Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination

BRINGING THE MEN BACK IN:

To reduce sex differences in employment outcomes, we must examine them in the context of the sex-gender hierarchy. The conventional explanation for wage gap—job segregation—is incorrect because it

The Paradox of Publicity

Although increases in status often lead to more favorable inferences about quality in subsequent evaluations, in this paper, we examine a setting in which an increase to an actor’s status results in

Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women

This article presents the results from two expectation-states studies on gender and double standards for task competence. The emergence of such standards under several experimental conditions is

Will Women be Women? Analyzing the Gender Difference Among Financial Experts

There are robust gender differences in the domains of risk taking, overconfidence and competition behavior. However, as expertise tends to level these differences, we ask whether financial experts

Work Uncertainty and the Promotion of Professional Women: The Case of Law Firm Partnership

Work uncertainty may affect gender disparities in professionals' upward mobility in organizational hierarchies. Professional work involves three forms of uncertainty – problem variability,

Matthew: Effect or Fable?

TLDR
This work estimates the effect of a scientist becoming a Howard Hughes Medical Institute HHMI Investigator on citations to articles the scientist published before the prize was awarded and finds evidence of a postappointment citation boost, but the effect is small and limited to a short window of time.

Should We Stay or Should We Go? Accountability, Status Anxiety, and Client Defections

Focusing empirically on what affected client defections from Arthur Andersen during its dramatic collapse in 2002, this study proposes that accountability-induced status anxiety is an important

Cumulative Gender Disadvantage in Contract Employment1

TLDR
The author finds support for two sources of women’s disadvantage: lower rates of movement across clients on the supply side and unmeasured demand‐side factors by which similar levels of tenure and client transitions accrue lower rewards to women.
...