Publish peer reviews
@article{Polka2018PublishPR,
title={Publish peer reviews},
author={Jessica K. Polka and R. Kiley and Boyana Konforti and B. Stern and R. Vale},
journal={Nature},
year={2018},
volume={560},
pages={545-547}
}Jessica K. Polka and colleagues call on journals to sign a pledge to make reviewers’ anonymous comments part of the official scientific record.Jessica K. Polka and colleagues call on journals to sign a pledge to make reviewers’ anonymous comments part of the official scientific record.
Topics from this paper
Paper Mentions
Blog Post
Blog Post
27 Citations
A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences
- Biology, Medicine
- PLoS biology
- 2019
- 26
- PDF
On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective
- Biology, Medicine
- PLoS biology
- 2019
- 46
- PDF
Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
- Psychology, Biology
- 2019
- 3
- PDF
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
- Sociology, Medicine
- Research integrity and peer review
- 2020
- 13
How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing
- Sociology, Medicine
- PloS one
- 2019
- 4
- PDF
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
- Political Science, Medicine
- Research integrity and peer review
- 2019
- 4
References
SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
- Medicine
- BMJ : British Medical Journal
- 2010
- 102
- PDF
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
- Psychology, Medicine
- PloS one
- 2017
- 53
- PDF
Persistent Underrepresentation of Women’s Science in High Profile Journals
- Psychology, Biology
- 2018
- 29
- PDF
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
- 2017
Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi
- A U G U S T
- 2010