Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal

  title={Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal},
  author={David J. Solomon and Bo-Christer Bj{\"o}rk},
  journal={J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.},
Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. [] Key Result These findings are consistent with other research on OA publishing and suggest that OA publishing funded through APCs is likely to continue to grow.

Tables from this paper

The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing
Analyzes the Directory of Open Access Journals to identify characteristics of OA academic journals related to the adoption of article processing charge (APC)-based business models, as well as the price points of journals that charge APCs.
A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals
Most authors appeared pleased with the experience and indicated they are likely to submit future manuscripts to the same or similar megajournal which seems to suggest these journals will continue to grow in popularity.
Investigation of the degree to which articles supported by research grants are published in open access health and life sciences journals
A bibliometric method is used to examine the relationship between two journal characteristics during 2009–2013: APCs and the percentage of published articles based on work that is supported by grants (grant-funded articles).
A study of open access journals using article processing charges
This study studied the APCs charged and article volumes of journals that were listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals as charging APCs, finding that Professionally published journals had substantially higher APCs than journals published by societies, universities, or scholars/researchers.
Pricing principles used by scholarly open access publishers
The pricing principles of 77 OA publishers publishing over 1,000 journals using APCs were studied and classified, finding that the country of origin of the author can also influence the pricing, in order to facilitate publishing for authors from developing countries.
Open Access for Publication – Can It Be Chosen?
The gap in the scientific impact of OA as opposed to traditionalnon-OA journals is steadily being narrowed and the choice to publish in an OA or non-OA journal remains the prerogative of the researcher depending on the availability of funds to pay the fees associated with OA and what the author desires from the publication.
Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year
The financial costs paid by individual medical researchers from meeting the article processing charges (APCs) levied by open access journals in 2019 were estimated to be between US$0 and US$34676.
Changes in revenue structure of a leading open access journal publisher: the case of BMC
The results show that BMC sets higher article processing charges for more frequently cited journals while setting lower charges for recently launched journals after controlling for other factors, suggesting there is no room to be overly optimistic about the open access journal market, irrespective of the present overall market growth.
A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany
A comparison with the related openly available cost data from Austria and the UK revealed that German universities and research organisations primarily funded articles in fully open access journals, while articles in hybrid journal accounted for the largest share of spending according to the Austrian and UK data.
Article processing charges and fully open access journals: National Health and Medical Research Council funded articles
  • N. Kirkman
  • Political Science, Medicine
    Journal of Health Information and Libraries Australasia
  • 2021
The disclosure of article processing charge payments should be mandated by the Council and included in the publication metadata deposited in repositories under the National Health and Medical Research Council’s OpenAccess Policy.


The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
A division into three distinct periods is suggested: The Pioneering years (1993–1999), the Innovation years (2000–2004), and the Consolidation years (2005–2009) are suggested.
Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors
Views were divided sharply along subject and geographical lines, demonstrating the need to survey large and robust samples of authors, and a snapshot study which while providing robust data requires a follow-up study to monitor opinion shifts in this fast‐changing area.
Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions.
Assessment of journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing found authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues.
A Method for Comparing Scholarly Journals as Service Providers to Authors
The method proposed, taking a “service to authors” perspective as a basis for benchmarking scientific journals, is useful and can provide information that is valuable to prospective authors in selected scientific disciplines.
Oxford Journals' adventures in open access
It is too soon to tell whether the ‘Oxford Open’ model will have an impact on subscriptions, usage, and citations, but further research is under way.
Authors and open access publishing
For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact.
Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint
A model for how prospective authors determine the value of submitting to a particular journal is presented, which includes eight factors that influence an author's decision and 21 other underlying factors.
Factors Academic Real Estate Authors Consider When Choosing Where to Submit a Manuscript for Publication
Executive Summary. As the number of refereed scholarly journals grows, authors have to choose among a wider range of outlets for their work. A survey of academic real estate authors in the United
JASIS and Library and Information Science Journal Rankings: A Review and Analysis of the Last Half-Century
The concept of journal ranking is explained along with the theoretical and practical significance of ranking journals. An eight-variable model for classifying journal-ranking studies is outlined. A