• Corpus ID: 148223644

Psychometric Validation of Dimensional Obsessive-compulsive Scale(DOCS) in Chinese College Students

@article{Shuangyu2012PsychometricVO,
  title={Psychometric Validation of Dimensional Obsessive-compulsive Scale(DOCS) in Chinese College Students},
  author={Zhang Shuang-yu},
  journal={Chinese journal of clinical psychology},
  year={2012}
}
  • Zhang Shuang-yu
  • Published 2012
  • Psychology
  • Chinese journal of clinical psychology
Objective: To revise the Dimensional Obsessive-compulsive Scale(DOCS) in a Chinese college student sample to find out an empirically justifiable factor structure and explore the distribution characteristics.Methods: A sample of 1787 students was tested with a measuring battery including DOCS: Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised(OCI-R),Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D) and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS).Results: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the 4… 
[Dimensional Approach to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale with Turkish Psychometric Properties].
TLDR
Positive correlations between DOCS, its sub-scales, and similar OCD scales suggest that the DOCS accurately measures the structures it claims to assess.
The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Form (DOCS-SF)
TLDR
There is strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale-short form for assessing OCD symptoms in individuals with this condition and in non-clinical individuals.
Factor Congruence and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) Across Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) is a self-report instrument that assesses the severity of the four most empirically supported OC symptom dimensions (Contamination, Responsibility,
Die Validierung der Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) an einer deutschsprachigen Stichprobe
Hintergrund: PatientInnen mit Zwangsstörungen werden in klinischer Forschung und Praxis häufig nicht erkannt oder fehldiagnostiziert, wodurch es zu verzögerten und unzureichenden Behandlungen kommt.