Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study.

@article{Meisel2012PsychologicalRT,
  title={Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study.},
  author={Susanne F Meisel and Catherine C. Walker and Jane Wardle},
  journal={Obesity},
  year={2012},
  volume={20 3},
  pages={540-6}
}
Genetic testing for obesity risk is increasingly available to the public but few studies have examined motivational or affective reactions. Here we report findings from a "vignette" study investigating reactions to "higher-risk" and "average-risk" results for the obesity-related FTO gene in two groups: a panel sample of individuals with weight concerns, for whom testing may have treatment implications (n = 306, mean age = 45 years, mean BMI = 35) and a student sample (n = 395, mean age = 25… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 14 times. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 19 extracted citations

A systematic review of the factors associated with interest in predictive genetic testing for obesity, type II diabetes and heart disease.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association • 2014
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Genetic Testing for Obesity: Implications and Challenges.

Current obesity reports • 2017
View 2 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 31 references

A twin study of human obesity.

View 8 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

MAGIC; Procardis Consortium. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index

EK Speliotes, CJ Willer, SI Berndt
2010
View 1 Excerpt

The Language of Life

FS Collins
Profile Books:London, • 2010

Association and predictors of congruence between interest in hypothetical and uptake of actual genetic testing

SC Sanderson, SC O’Neill, DB White, CM. McBride
Ann Beh Med 2008;35:S20 • 2008

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…