Psychological, Historical, and Ethical Reflections on the Mendelian Paradox

@article{Nissani1994PsychologicalHA,
  title={Psychological, Historical, and Ethical Reflections on the Mendelian Paradox},
  author={Moti Nissani},
  journal={Perspectives in Biology and Medicine},
  year={1994},
  volume={37},
  pages={182 - 196}
}
  • Moti Nissani
  • Published 1994
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
By 1911 [1], R. A. Fisher sensed some statistical irregularities in Mendel's classic paper [2]. Twenty-five years later, Fisher published an analysis of Mendel's experiments, concluding that "the data of most, if not all, of the experiments have been falsified so as to agree closely with Mendel's expectations" [3, p. 164]. In private, Fisher referred to his discovery that Mendel data had been "faked" as "abominable" and a "shocking experience" [4, pp. 296—297]. Fisher's dispassionate analysis… Expand

Topics from this paper

Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866).
  • Avital Pilpel
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2007
TLDR
This paper investigates Fisher's paper from the point of view of rational belief change theory: what changes of belief about Mendel's experiment does Fisher go through and with what justification and leads to surprising insights about what Fisher had done right and wrong, and, more generally, about the limits of statistical methods in detecting error. Expand
Gregor Mendel , his experiments and their statistical evaluation
KALINA J. 2014: Gregor Mendel, his experiments and their statistical evaluation. Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae (Brno) 99(1): 87–99. – Gregor Mendel (1822–1884) is now generallyExpand
Gregor Mendel's Genetic Experiments A Statistical Analysis after 150 Years
Gregor Mendel is generally acknowledged not only as the founder of genetics but also as the author of the rst mathematical result in biology. Although his education had been questioned for a longExpand
The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science: A Few Reflections on Campanario's Note
The extent of resistance to original contributions of obscure scientists is controversial. Some hold that such resistance is rare, and hence requires little study and no remedy. But others argueExpand
Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review.
TLDR
A synthesis of botanical and historical evidence supports the conclusion that Mendel did not fabricate his data, his description of his experiments is literal, he articulated the laws of inheritance attributed to him insofar as was possible given the information he had, and he neither strongly supported nor opposed Darwin. Expand
Conceptual conservatism: An understated variable in human affairs?
Abstract Experimental psychology strongly supports the notion of conceptual conservatism—the human tendency to cling to strongly-held beliefs long after these beliefs have been decisivelyExpand
Mendel in the C-Suite: Design and the Evolution of Strategies
A “Mendelian” executive is proposed as an image of strategy making that lies intermediate between the godlike powers of intentional design of rational choice approaches and a Darwinian process ofExpand
Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research
Abstract The frequently-encountered wholesale dismissal of either interdisciplinary knowledge or research reflects a profound misunderstanding of their vital contributions to scholarship, society,Expand
Write a Scientific Paper (WASP): An overview of differences in styles between the sciences and the humanities.
  • V. Grech
  • Medicine, Sociology
  • Early human development
  • 2019
TLDR
The acute difficulties when attempting to read or write works in different disciplines are addressed, as well as the differences in perceptions and values when approaching written works in unfamiliar branches of academia. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES
Mendel and Methodology
  • R. Root-Bernstein
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching
  • 1983
TLDR
There is, I believe, a fundamental tension between the statistical assumptions and the biological reality ofgenetics that accounts for the debate over Mendel's integrity and it is still possible that the monk may be redeemed. Expand
Mendel's experiments: A reinterpretation
TLDR
The conclusion is that Mendel deliberately, though without any real falsification, tried to suggest to his audience and readers an unlikely and substantially wrong reconstruction of the first and most important phase of his research, which remains a landmark in the history of science. Expand
Fisher's contributions to genetics and heredity, with special emphasis on the Gregor Mendel controversy.
TLDR
A review of A.R. Fisher's most salient points as regards Mendel's "too good" fit, within the context of Fisher's extensive contributions to the development of genetical and evolutionary theory. Expand
A cognitive reinterpretation of Stanley Milgram's observations on obedience to authority.
Stanley Milgram's (1974) observations on obedience to authority have exerted a great deal of influence on such diverse disciplines as social psychology, holocaust studies, and political science. InExpand
When Prophecy Fails
In 1954 Leon Festinger, a brilliant young experimental social psychologist in the process of inventing a new theory of human behavior - the theory of cognitive dissonance - and two of his colleagues,Expand
Cooking and trimming by scientific giants
  • I. M. Klotz
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
  • 1992
ALMOST 2 CENTURIES AGO, IN 1830, Charles Babbage, one of the long line of distinguished individuals who succeeded Isaac Newton as Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge,Expand
Computational Philosophy of Science
By applying research in artificial intelligence to problems in the philosophy of science, Paul Thagard develops an exciting new approach to the study of scientific reasoning. He uses computationalExpand
Experimental Studies of Belief Dependence of Observations and of Resistance to Conceptual Change
Natural scientists were invited to evaluate a rediscovery-based written manual for teaching high school science and math. The first session refamiliarized participants with the concepts thisExpand
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
A scientific community cannot practice its trade without some set of received beliefs. These beliefs form the foundation of the "educational initiation that prepares and licenses the student forExpand
Science as a Way of Knowing—Genetics
TLDR
The purpose is to offer suggestions for improving the first-year biology courses in the universities, and the method consists of emphasizing the conceptual framework of the biological sciences, showing how scientific information is obtained and evaluated, pointing out the strengths and limitations of scientific procedures. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...