Psychogenic Infertility—Myths and Facts

@article{Wischmann2003PsychogenicIA,
  title={Psychogenic Infertility—Myths and Facts},
  author={Tewes H. Wischmann},
  journal={Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics},
  year={2003},
  volume={20},
  pages={485-494}
}
Purpose : The hypothesis of this review is that the role of psychological factors as the sole cause of infertility is generally overrated. Methods : A review is given of studies concerning the influence of psychological factors on the development of infertility. Result : A prevalence of psychogenic infertility of 10–15 per cent must be discussed critically. A value of approximately 5 per cent is more realistic. Equating unexplained infertility with psychogenic infertility is not justified. A… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 144 references

The psychologization of infertility

  • F van Balen
  • In Infertility Around the Globe,
  • 2002
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

ed): Involuntary Childlessness. Psychological Assessment, Counselling and Psychotherapy

  • B Strauß
  • 2002
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Facteurs psychologiques dans l’infertilite feminine

  • M Bydlowski
  • Gynecol Obstet Fertil
  • 2003
1 Excerpt

Psychogenic Infertility: Fact or fiction? Med Aspects Hum Sex 1972;6:168–175

  • A Decker
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics,
  • 2003

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…