Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.

@article{Crupi2009PseudodiagnosticityR,
  title={Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.},
  author={Vincenzo Crupi and Katya Tentori and Luigi Lombardi},
  journal={Psychological review},
  year={2009},
  volume={116 4},
  pages={971-85}
}
In the psychology of reasoning and judgment, the pseudodiagnosticity task has been a major tool for the empirical investigation of people's ability to search for diagnostic information. A novel normative analysis of this experimental paradigm is presented, by which the participants' prevailing responses turn out not to support the generally accepted existence of a reasoning bias. The conclusions drawn do not rest on pragmatic concerns suggesting alleged divergences between the experimenter's… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 51 references

Everyday irrationality

R. M. Dawes
Cambridge, MA: Westview. • 2001
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Information, relevance, working memory, and the consideration of alternatives

C. R. Mynatt, M. E. Doherty, W. Dragan
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, • 1993
View 8 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Pseudodiagnosticity

M. E. Doherty, C. R. Mynatt, R. D. Tweney, M. D. Schiavo
Acta Psychologica • 1979
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

'Pseudodiagnosticity' in an idealized medical problem-solving environment.

Journal of medical education • 1982
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Rarity, pseudodiagnosticity and Bayesian reasoning

A. Feeney, Evans, T J.St.B., S. Venn
Thinking and Reasoning, • 2008
View 1 Excerpt

Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement

Evans, J. St. B.T.
Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press. • 2007

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…