Provider deferred decisions on hemoglobin A1c results: a report from the Colorado Research Network (CaReNet) and the High Plains Research Network (HPRN).

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results are generally reviewed several days after office visits. The clinical decisions on elevated HbA1cs may be complex and are rarely urgent. Providers may elect to defer the decision or its implementation to a future clinical encounter. OBJECTIVE To determine the occurrence rate, predictors, and eventual decision outcomes for HbA1c deferred decisions. DESIGN Provider questionnaire completed when HbA1c results from type 2 diabetes patients were reviewed, followed by a chart review on deferred cases 6 months later. PARTICIPANTS Providers at 19 Colorado primary care clinics. MEASUREMENTS For HbA1c > or =7%, whether the decision or its implementation was deferred. In deferred cases, whether a clinical decision was eventually made. RESULTS Of the 311 HbA1cs > or =7%, 31 (10.0%) had deferred decisions. In multivariate analysis, deferred decisions were more likely in African Americans (odds ratio [OR] 4.91, 95% CI 1.81, 13.3) and less likely when the patient's usual provider reviewed the HbA1c (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18, 0.90). In the chart review, for deferred cases (n = 18), a clinical decision was made in 14 cases, usually at the next clinical encounter. In 4 cases, the HbA1c was never addressed. CONCLUSION Deferred decisions on HbA1c results are infrequent, and usually the HbA1c is eventually addressed.

Cite this paper

@article{Parnes2006ProviderDD, title={Provider deferred decisions on hemoglobin A1c results: a report from the Colorado Research Network (CaReNet) and the High Plains Research Network (HPRN).}, author={Bennett L. Parnes and Linda J Niebauer and Sherry Holcomb and Miriam Dickinson and Jack Westfall and Becky Vanvorst and Wilson D. Pace}, journal={Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM}, year={2006}, volume={19 1}, pages={20-3} }