Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We performed a prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy (RP) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for solitary pelvic stones >3 cm and assessed the outcome results. METHODS From 2010 to 2012, 44 patients with a solitary pelvic stone >3 cm without any anatomical abnormality were randomized to either RP or PNL… (More)
DOI: 10.1159/000353973

Topics

1 Figure or Table

Statistics

0204060201520162017
Citations per Year

Citation Velocity: 12

Averaging 12 citations per year over the last 3 years.

Learn more about how we calculate this metric in our FAQ.

Cite this paper

@article{Singh2014ProspectiveRC, title={Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones.}, author={Vishwajeet Singh and Rahul Sinha and Dheeraj Gupta and Mohit Pandey}, journal={Urologia internationalis}, year={2014}, volume={92 4}, pages={392-5} }