Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.

@article{Quentin2014ProspectiveEO,
  title={Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy na{\"i}ve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.},
  author={Michael Quentin and Dirk Blondin and Christian Arsov and Lars Schimmoeller and Andreas Hiester and Erhard Godehardt and Peter S Albers and Gerald Antoch and Robert Rabenalt},
  journal={The Journal of urology},
  year={2014},
  volume={192 5},
  pages={1374-9}
}
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is increasingly performed to diagnose prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of well controlled, prospective trials to support this treatment method. We prospectively compared magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective study in 132 biopsy naïve men with increased… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
27 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 27 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…