Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLAN

@article{Voros2014ProspectiveHC,
  title={Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLAN},
  author={Szilard Voros and Sarah Rinehart and Jesus Gustavo Vazquez-Figueroa and Anna M Kalynych and Dimitrios I. Karmpaliotis and Zhen Hou Qing Qian and Parag Joshi and Hunt Anderson and Laura Murrieta and Charles I Wilmer and Hjalmar G. Carlson and William L. Ballard and Charles F. Brown},
  journal={The American journal of cardiology},
  year={2014},
  volume={113 1},
  pages={
          23-9
        }
}
The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. Eighty-five lesions (40% to 99% diameter stenosis) in 85 patients were prospectively interrogated by QCA, CTA, IVUS, and FFR. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), minimal lumen area (MLA), and percent area stenosis (%AS) were… CONTINUE READING
BETA
Tweets
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 CITATIONS

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…