• DOI:10.1017/S0956793300002089
• Corpus ID: 161116889

Property Rights in Pheasants: Landlords, Farmers and the Game Laws, 1860–80

@article{Fisher2000PropertyRI,
  title={Property Rights in Pheasants: Landlords, Farmers and the Game Laws, 1860–80},
  author={John Robert Fisher},
  journal={Rural History},
  year={2000},
  volume={11},
  pages={165 - 180}
}

• J. Fisher
• Published 1 October 2000
• History, Economics
• Rural History

The deference shown by English tenant farmers to their landlords was the despair of English radicals in the nineteenth century. This was especially the case for Cobden and Bright, the leaders of the Anti-Corn Law League. As firm believers in Ricardo's theory of rent, according to which only landowners gained from the Corn Laws, they felt that tenant-farmers should have been the natural allies of the League. Unfortunately, they proved unable to convince farmers of this logic. Their attempts to drive a wedge between landlord and tenant remained unavailing – until 1845, when John Bright raised the question of the game laws in the Commons. The select committee that followed tapped a rich vein of farmer resentment and hostility, one that led nowhere at the time but remained to be exploited for the next forty years.