Proof Complexity and SAT Solving

@inproceedings{Buss2021ProofCA,
  title={Proof Complexity and SAT Solving},
  author={Samuel R. Buss and Jakob Nordstr{\"o}m},
  booktitle={Handbook of Satisfiability},
  year={2021}
}
This chapter gives an overview of proof complexity and connections to SAT solving, focusing on proof systems such as resolution, Nullstellensatz, polynomial calculus, and cutting planes (corresponding to conflict-driven clause learning, algebraic approaches using linear algebra or Gröbner bases, and pseudo-Boolean solving, respectively). There is also a discussion of extended resolution (which is closely related to DRAT proof logging) and Frege and extended Frege systems more generally. An… 
A Cardinal Improvement to Pseudo-Boolean Solving
TLDR
This work presents a technique to recover cardinality constraints from CNF on the fly during search by collecting potential building blocks of cardinality constraint constraints during propagation and combining these blocks during conflict analysis.
Certified Symmetry and Dominance Breaking for Combinatorial Optimisation
TLDR
It is demonstrated that the cutting planes proof system can efficiently verify fully general symmetry breaking in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving, thus providing, for the first time, a unified method to certify a range of advanced SAT techniques that also includes XOR and cardinality reasoning.
Justifying All Differences Using Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning
TLDR
This paper demonstrates that simple, clean, and efficient proof logging is still possible for the all-different constraint, through pseudo-Boolean reasoning.
Practical algebraic calculus and Nullstellensatz with the checkers Pacheck and Pastèque and Nuss-Checker
TLDR
The practical algebraic calculus is presented as an instantiation of the polynomial calculus that can be checked efficiently and extension rules to simulate essential rewriting techniques required in practice are introduced.
Certifying Parity Reasoning Efficiently Using Pseudo-Boolean Proofs
TLDR
This work shows how to instead use pseudo-Boolean inequalities with extension variables to concisely justify XOR reasoning, and points the way towards a unified approach for efficient machine-verifiable proofs for a rich class of combinatorial optimization paradigms.
INFORMATION IN PROPOSITIONAL PROOFS AND ALGORITHMIC PROOF SEARCH
  • J. Krajícek
  • Computer Science, Mathematics
    The Journal of Symbolic Logic
  • 2021
TLDR
Using classical proof complexity results about reflection principles it is proved that a time-optimal proof search algorithm exists without restricting proof systems iff a p- optimal proof system exists.
Cutting to the Core of Pseudo-Boolean Optimization: Combining Core-Guided Search with Cutting Planes Reasoning
TLDR
This work lifts core-guided search to pseudo-Boolean (PB) solvers, which deal with more general PB optimization problems and operate natively with cardinality constraints, and derives stronger cardinality constraint constraints, which yield better updates to solution bounds.
Watched Propagation of 0-1 Integer Linear Constraints
TLDR
This work extends the CDCL paradigm from clausal constraints to \(0\)-\(1\) integer linear constraints, also known as (linear) PB constraints, and proposes a counter technique which watches all literals of a PB constraint.
Kernelization, Proof Complexity and Social Choice
TLDR
A notable application of the framework is to impossibility results in computational social choice: it is shown that, for any fixed number of agents, propositional translations of the Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite impossibility theorems have subexponential size Frege proofs.
Perfect Matching in Random Graphs is as Hard as Tseitin
We study the complexity of proving that a sparse random regular graph on an odd number of vertices does not have a perfect matching, and related problems involving each vertex being matched some
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 334 REFERENCES
On the interplay between proof complexity and SAT solving
This paper is intended as an informal and accessible survey of proof complexity for non-experts, focusing on some comparatively weak proof systems of particular interest in connection with SAT
In Between Resolution and Cutting Planes: A Study of Proof Systems for Pseudo-Boolean SAT Solving
TLDR
It is shown that even if general addition is allowed, this proof system is still polynomially simulated by resolution with respect to proof size as long as coefficients are polynOMially bounded.
Automating algebraic proof systems is NP-hard
TLDR
This work extends, and gives a simplified proof of, the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller that established an analogous result for Resolution, and shows that algebraic proofs are hard to find.
DRAT Proofs, Propagation Redundancy, and Extended Resolution
TLDR
The proof complexity of RAT proofs and related systems including BC, SPR, and PR which use blocked clauses and (subset) propagation redundancy are studied and a new inference SR is introduced using substitution redundancy.
On Tackling the Limits of Resolution in SAT Solving
TLDR
A new problem transformation is proposed, which enables reducing the decision problem for formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNF) to the problem of solving maximum satisfiability over Horn formulas, and proves a polynomial bound on the number of MaxSAT resolution steps for pigeonhole formulas.
Relating Proof Complexity Measures and Practical Hardness of SAT
TLDR
A systematic study of the interconnections between theoretical complexity and practical SAT solver performance and concludes that the resolution space complexity of a formula would seem to be a more fine-grained indicator of whether the formula is hard or easy than the length or width needed in a resolution proof.
MaxSAT Resolution With the Dual Rail Encoding
TLDR
This paper investigates the DRMaxSAT proof system, and shows that DR MaxSAT p-simulates general resolution, that AC0-Frege+PHP p-Simulates DRMax sAT, and that DRMax SAT can not p- Simulate AC0 -Frege-PHP or the cutting planes proof system.
Logical Foundations of Proof Complexity
TLDR
The result is a uniform treatment of many systems in the literature, including Buss's theories for the polynomial hierarchy and many disparate systems for complexity classes such as AC0, AC0(m), TC0, NC1, L, NL, NC, and P.
Algebraic proof complexity: progress, frontiers and challenges
We survey recent progress in the proof complexity of strong proof systems and its connection to algebraic circuit complexity, showing how the synergy between the two gives rise to new approaches to
Proof Complexity Meets Algebra
TLDR
It is shown that, for the most studied propositional, algebraic, and semialgebraic proof systems, the classical constructions of pp-interpretability, homomorphic equivalence, and addition of constants to a core preserve the proof complexity of the CSP.
...
...