Progress in understanding survey data fabrication

@article{Koczela2016ProgressIU,
  title={Progress in understanding survey data fabrication},
  author={Steve Koczela and Fritz J. Scheuren},
  journal={Statistical journal of the IAOS},
  year={2016},
  volume={32},
  pages={277-282}
}
Writing in 1945, Leo Crespi warned “The prevalence of so-called ‘cheating’ by interviewers in the process of obtaining public opinion and market research data has become an increasingly grave concern to responsible opinion researchers” [10]. He could have said essentially the same today, though the cause for concern is more complex than in the past. The forms of survey data fabrication we are facing today are more diverse, and in some cases more insidious than individual interviewers sitting on… 
Fabrication of interview data
Purpose Evidence from past surveys suggests that some interviewees simplify their responses even in very well-organized and highly respected surveys. This paper aims to demonstrate that some
Detecting falsification in a television audience measurement panel survey
Case studies reporting real-world experiences with survey falsification are uncommon. In this article, we document the experience of a panel survey in India that produced TV viewing estimates (“TV
Interview with Fritz J. Scheuren: Statistical Mentsch
TLDR
This new interview with Fritz Scheuren will expand on that piece and bring out more of his views on family, statistics, and life in general.
Perceived Corruption, Trust, and Interviewer Behavior in 26 European Countries
Identifying illicit behavior in survey research is inherently problematic, since self-reports are untrustworthy. We argue that fraudulent interviewers can, however, be identified through statistical
Профессия Полевой Интервьюер (Field Interviewer Profession)
The preprint was written based on the results of a methodical project organized by the Laboratory of Social Research Methodology of the Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting of the Russian
Transitar para um ensino remoto emergencial
Apesar de não ser recente a discussão sobre a importância do uso de tecnologias digitais na educação, sobretudo por ser já vastamente reconhecida a sua importância no desenvolvimento de competências
Fälschungen von Umfragedaten

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Curbstoning and beyond: Confronting data fabrication in survey research
TLDR
The problem of fabrication is looked at in a different way, exploring new data that shows the problem goes beyond interviewer curbstoning and exploring the utility of fraud investigation frameworks in detecting survey data fabrication.
Don't Get Duped: Fraud through Duplication in Public Opinion Surveys
TLDR
The likelihood of encountering near duplicates in survey data is considered, methods to fingerprint suspicious observations are suggested and nearly one in five widely used country-year surveys surveys from major international data sets have exact or near duplicating in excess of 5% of observations are argued.
Evaluating a new proposal for detecting data falsification in surveys: The underlying causes of ``high matches'' between survey respondents
A recent paper (1) proposed a new detection method for data falsification in surveys called the maximum percent match statistic. The statistic measures the maximum percentage of questions on which
Interviewer falsification: Current and best practices for prevention, detection, and mitigation
TLDR
What is believed to be a state-of-the-art program for interviewer falsification mitigation is described, including a proposed path forward in the areas of metrics and management.
When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality
TLDR
It is demonstrated that simply a 20-minute conversation with a gay canvasser produced a large and sustained shift in attitudes toward same-sex marriage for Los Angeles County residents, as large as the difference between attitudes in Georgia and Massachusetts.
Curbstoning and culture
This paper examines various aspects of data fabrication, or “curbstoning” in field surveys. Our ability to detect and control such behavior is limited by the costs of the most effective instruments,
THE CHEATER PROBLEM IN POLLING
HUMAN BEINGS, it seems, remain human beings when they are asking questions for polling organizations. They remain human enough to sometimes make up answers instead of pounding pavements in search of
Detection techniques applied, Paper presented at Washington Statistical Society – Curb-stoning, a Too Neglected and Very Embarrassing Survey Problem, December 2014, Washington DC
  • 2014
The Cheater Problem Revisited: Lessons from Six Decades of State Department Polling
  • Paper presented at New Frontiers in Preventing, Detecting, and Remediating Fabrication in Survey Research conference, NEAAPOR, Cambridge, MA
  • 2015
Approaches for detecting fabricated survey data
  • Paper presented at New Approaches to Dealing With Survey Data Fabrication conference, NORC, Bethesda, MD
  • 2016
...
...