Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory

@article{Souza2012ProcessingOR,
  title={Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory},
  author={Alessandra S. Souza and Klaus Oberauer and Miriam Gade and Michel Druey},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  year={2012},
  volume={65},
  pages={1006 - 1033}
}
The article investigates the relation between declarative and procedural working memory (WM; Oberauer, 2009). Two experiments test the assumption that representations in the two subsystems are selected for processing in analogous ways. Participants carried out a series of decisions on memorized lists of digits. For each decision, they had to select declarative and procedural representations. Regarding declarative representations, participants selected a memory set and a digit within this set as… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs

TLDR
Assessment of evidence for n-2 list-repetition costs across eight experiments in which participants switched between memory lists to perform speeded classifications, mental arithmetic, or a local recognition test shows analogous processing principles in declarative and procedural WM, and questions the relevance of inhibitory processes for efficient switching between mental sets.

Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative

TLDR
A novel method of independently manipulating declarative item- updating and procedural task-updating processes in working memory is devised, providing new evidence that the updating of information inDeclarative and procedural WM is mutually facilitative, such that opening the gate for updating Declarative content reduces the time needed to update procedural content, and vice versa.

The Role of Working Memory Gating in Task Switching: A Procedural Version of the Reference-Back Paradigm

TLDR
The results of two experiments demonstrated that the cost of gate opening was eliminated in task switching trials, implying that both processes operate in parallel.

A Common Capacity Limitation for Response and Item Selection in Working Memory

  • M. Janczyk
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2017
TLDR
The present study focused on the selection of single items in declarative and single responses in procedural WM, and predicted that item switch costs are present with a long but not with a short stimulus onset asynchrony.

An empirical test of the independence between declarative and procedural working memory in Oberauer’s (2009) theory

TLDR
This study tested the hypothesis that working memory could be conceived as two symmetrical subsystems with analogous structure and processing principles by using a complex span task in which participants were asked to maintain consonants for further recall while performing response selection tasks.

Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?

When stimuli afford multiple tasks, switching among them involves promoting one of several task-sets in play into a most-active state. This process, often conceptualized as retrieving task parameters

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES

Selection of objects and tasks in working memory

TLDR
The number of objects in working memory affected object-switch costs but not task- switch costs, counter to the notion of a general resource of executive attention.

Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.

  • K. Oberauer
  • Psychology, Computer Science
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2002
TLDR
The results support a model distinguishing 3 states of representations in working memory: the activated part of long-term memory, a capacity limited region of direct access, and a focus of attention.

Serial attention within working memory

TLDR
Alternative visual and conceptual repetition-priming and memory retrieval explanations for the cost involved in switching between items in WM are addressed.

Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs

TLDR
In these memory-dependent, alphabet-arithmetic tasks, interference due to involuntary task (and/or response) retrieval primarily increases general multi-task effects, such as maintaining activation of the current task.

Control of the contents of working memory--a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups.

  • K. Oberauer
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2005
TLDR
Old adults showed the same flexibility in the arithmetic updating task but seemed somewhat less able or inclined to temporarily move information into the activated part of LTM in the modified Sternberg task.

Design for a working memory.

Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.

In an investigation of task-set reconfiguration, participants switched between 2 tasks on every 2nd trial in 5 experiments and on every 4th trial in a final experiment. The tasks were to classify

Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

  • U. MayrR. Kliegl
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2000
TLDR
Testing the hypothesis of a close relationship between the intentional component of task-set switching and long-term memory (LTM) retrieval and results were consistent with the hypothesis that the intentional switch-cost component reflects the time demands of retrieving appropriate task rules from LTM.

On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.

TLDR
The author derive from the time-based resource-sharing model of working memory a mathematical function relating the cognitive load involved by concurrent processing to the amount of information that can be simultaneously maintained active in working memory.

Working memory.

...