Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice

  title={Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice
  author={Emmanuel Chemla and Lewis Bott},

Figures and Tables from this paper

What makes an inference robust?∗

Sentences involving disjunction give rise to ignorance, distributive and free choice inferences. These inferences display certain similarities with regular Scalar Implicatures (SIs) and some

Negative free choice

Free Choice (FC) is an inference arising from the interaction between existential modals and disjunction. Schematically, a sentence of the form permitted(A or B) gives rise to the inference ◊ A ∧◊ B

Testing theories of temporal inferences: Evidence from child language

Sentences involving past tense verbs, such as “My dogs were on the carpet”, tend to give rise to the inference that the corresponding present tense version, “My dogs are on the carpet”, is false.

Choice and prohibition in non-monotonic contexts

This paper investigates free choice in sentences involving a non-monotonic modified numeral, under which a possibility modal scoping over disjunction is embedded, and sketches two possible solutions within this approach, either adopting a different recent implicature algorithm, or exploring a different meaning for modified numerals with exactly.

An Experimental Comparison Between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures

We compare two aspects of meaning, namely the presupposition of stop in the scope of negation (John didn’t stop going to the movies. ↪ John used to go to the movies.) and the scalar implicature

Context, Content, and the Occasional Costs of Implicature Computation

A theory of processing costs that makes no reference to the strengthening mechanism or to other aspects of the derivation of the sentence's form/meaning, and proposes that when the hearer has to disambiguate between a sentence's basic and strengthened meaning, the processing cost is a function of a measure of the semantic complexity of the chosen meaning and how much relevant uncertainty it leaves behind in the context.

Disjunction Under Deontic Modals: Experimental Data

  • Y. Liu
  • Psychology
    ESSLLI Student Sessions
  • 2018
Each experiment separately examined the availability and processing time-course of the three types of inferences associated with may/or versus must/or sentences and the experimental results fit Simons’s analysis to a large extent.

The role of focus intonation in implicature computation: a comparison with only and also

The function of focus is to activate alternatives, and these activated alternatives are used to compute the corresponding inferences of an utterance. The experimental research reported here

Presuppositions vs. Scalar Implicatures in Aquisition

Scalar implicatures, (1b) or (2b), and presuppositions, (3b), are two central types of inferences that we draw from sentences. Traditionally, these inferences are considered to be very different from

Cognitive processing of scalar implicatures with Chinese gradable adjectives

Abstract In previous research comparing the Context-driven Model with the Default Model of meaning processing, the former was preferred. It predicts that contexts play an exclusively decisive role in



Processing presuppositions: Dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment

Two processing accounts of presupposition projection are developed and test, inspired by dynamic semantics and pragmatic theories respectively, and it is shown that participants were faster to derive the global interpretation than the local interpretation, in contrast to the local-first model.

Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences

Innocent exclusion in an Alternative Semantics

The exclusive component of unembedded disjunctions is standardly derived as a conversational implicature by assuming that or forms a lexical scale with and. It is well known, however, that this

Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures

Making disjunctions exclusive

This work investigates how extra effort applied to disjunctive statements leads to a pragmatic interpretation of “or”, or but not both, and hypothesized that conditions encouraging more processing effort would give rise to more pragmatic inferences and hence to more exclusive interpretations of the disjunction.

Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal/or interaction

In this paper, the meanings of sentences containing the word or and a modal verb are used to arrive at a novel account of the meaning of or coordinations. It is proposed that or coordinations denote