Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire

@article{Braga2001ProblemOrientedPD,
  title={Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire},
  author={A. Braga and D. Kennedy and E. Waring and A. Piehl},
  journal={Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency},
  year={2001},
  volume={38},
  pages={195 - 225}
}
  • A. Braga, D. Kennedy, +1 author A. Piehl
  • Published 2001
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
  • Operation Ceasefire is a problem-oriented policing intervention aimed at reducing youth homicide and youth firearms violence in Boston. It represented an innovative partnership between researchers and practitioners to assess the city's youth homicide problem and implement an intervention designed to have a substantial near-term impact on the problem. Operation Ceasefire was based on the “pulling levers” deterrence strategy that focused criminal justice attention on a small number of chronically… CONTINUE READING
    472 Citations

    Figures and Tables from this paper

    What Can Cities Do to Prevent Serious Youth Violence
    • 2
    • PDF
    Collaborating to Reduce Violence: The Impact of Focused Deterrence in Kansas City
    • 5
    • Highly Influenced
    Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide
    • 98
    • PDF
    Changing the Street Dynamic
    • 33
    Reducing Gang Violence Using Focused Deterrence: Evaluating the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV)
    • 81
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
    Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy
    • 342
    • PDF
    Homicide in Minneapolis
    • 64
    The Unprecedented Epidemic in Youth Violence
    • 256
    Youth Homicide in Boston
    • 24
    The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault.
    • 1,164
    • PDF
    Testing for Structural Breaks in the Evaluation of Programs
    • 129
    • PDF
    Evaluating Crime Prevention
    • 89