Probabilistic reasoning

@inproceedings{Tversky1993ProbabilisticR,
  title={Probabilistic reasoning},
  author={Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman},
  year={1993}
}
Many decisions are based on beliefs concerning the likelihood of uncertain events such as the outcome of an election, the guilt of a defendant, or the future value of the dollar. These beliefs are usually expressed in statements such as "1 think that . . .," "chances are . . .," "it is unlikely that . . .," and so forth. Occasionally, beliefs concerning uncertain events are expressed in numerical form as odds or subjective probabilities. What determines such beliefs? How do people assess the… Expand
Certainty-Factor-Like Structures in Bayesian Networks
TLDR
It is shown that certainty-factor-like structures occur frequently in practical Bayesian network models as causal independence assumptions, and this insight may lead to a reappraisal of the certainty-Factor model. Expand
A Behavioral Demonstration of Overconfidence in Judgment
TLDR
An approach to the study of overprecision is outlined that avoids some of the methodological problems of other approaches and better reflects the way uncertainty affects choices in everyday life. Expand
Bayesian Networks: Aspects of Approximate Inference
TLDR
By means of a real-life qualitative network in oncology it is demonstrated that the use of situational signs can effectively forestall uninformative results upon inference and an algorithm for inference with undirected networks which is equivalent to the loopy-propagation algorithm is analyzed. Expand
Comparing and Evaluating Approaches to Probabilistic Reasoning: Theory, Implementation, and Applications
TLDR
The maximum entropy approach is featured as a powerful and elegant method that combines convenience with respect to knowledge representation with excellent inference properties in first-order probabilistic reasoning. Expand
Anti-Exceptionalism About Requirements of Epistemic Rationality
  • C. Field
  • Medicine, Philosophy
  • Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology
  • 2021
TLDR
It is argued that, as for other topics, one’s total evidence can sometimes support false beliefs about what rationality requires, and that such beliefs incur heavy explanatory burdens that the authors should avoid. Expand
Cognitive Processing of Causal Knowledge
TLDR
It is shown how studies by Piaget indicate that humans learn causal structure by observing the same independencies and dependencies as those used by certain algorithms for learning the structure of a Bayesian network. Expand
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignorance, while ubiquitous in everyday argumentation, have been subject to little systematic investigationExpand
Opinion Dynamics Model Based on Cognitive Biases of Complex Agents
TLDR
An introduction to a novel way of simulating individual and group opinion dynamics, taking into account how various sources of information are filtered due to cognitive biases, and compares the effects of two important psychological mechanisms: confirmation bias and politically motivated reasoning. Expand
Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection
Ironically, when consumers turn to an information source to assist in decision making, they are faced with the added responsibility of having to make a decision about the information source itself. AExpand
When unlikely outcomes occur: the role of communication format in maintaining communicator credibility
Abstract The public expects science to reduce or eliminate uncertainty, yet scientific forecasts are probabilistic (at best) and it is simply not possible to make predictions with certainty. WhilstExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 124 REFERENCES
Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness
This paper explores a heuristic — representativeness — according to which the subjective probability of an event, or a sample, is determined by the degree to which it: (i) is similar in essentialExpand
Reasoning with Uncertain Beliefs
This chapter describes the reasoning with uncertain beliefs. There are circumstances in which it would not be appropriate for an agent to invest its beliefs with total commitment. An agent mayExpand
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
TLDR
Three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty are described: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development. Expand
On the psychology of prediction
In this paper, we explore the rules that determine intuitive predictions and judgments of confidence and contrast these rules to the normative principles of statistical prediction. Two classes ofExpand
BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS
“Suppose you have run an experiment on 20 subjects, and have obtained a significant result which confirms your theory ( z = 2.23, p If you feel that the probability is somewhere around .85, you mayExpand
Elicitation of Probabilities for Belief Networks: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information
TLDR
This paper proposes a method for elicitation of probabilities from a domain expert that is non-invasive and accommodates whatever probabilistic information the expert is willing to state and uses this canonical form to derive second-order probability distributions over the desired probabilities. Expand
Approximate probability and expectation of gambles
scientific procedures of measurement have such an approximate character and there is consequently an obvious need to capture in explicit axiomatic form the implicit assumptions underlying actualExpand
An inquiry into computer understanding
TLDR
This paper shows that the difficulties McDermott described are a result of insisting on using logic as the language of commonsense reasoning, and if (Bayesian) probability is used, none of the technical difficulties found in using logic arise. Expand
A mathematical theory of evidence
TLDR
This book develops an alternative to the additive set functions and the rule of conditioning of the Bayesian theory: set functions that need only be what Choquet called "monotone of order of infinity." and Dempster's rule for combining such set functions. Expand
A model of inexact reasoning in medicine
TLDR
A quantification scheme is proposed which attempts to model the inexact reasoning processes of medical experts and offers advantages over Bayesian analysis when they are utilized in a rule-based computer diagnostic system. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...