Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace

@article{Slantchev2005ProbabilisticCS,
  title={Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace},
  author={Branislav L. Slantchev and Anna Alexandrova and Erik Gartzke},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  year={2005},
  volume={99},
  pages={459 - 462}
}
Rosato (2003) claims to have discredited democratic peace theories. However, the methodological approach adopted by the study cannot reliably generate the conclusions espoused by the author. Rosato seems to misunderstand the probabilistic nature of most arguments about democratic peace and ignores issues that an appropriate research design should account for. Further, the study's use of case studies and data sets without attention to selection-bias produces examples that actually support… 

Explaining the Democratic Peace

  • Sebastian Rosato
  • Political Science, Philosophy
    American Political Science Review
  • 2005
I am grateful for the opportunity to respond to the rejoinders to my article, “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory” (Rosato 2003). In each case, I summarize the core issues at stake and

The democratic peace and the new evolution of an old idea

Since the democratic peace was ‘rediscovered’ in the 1970s, the phenomenon has become a mainstream research agenda. Significant attention and page space has been dedicated to large-N statistical

Explaining Peaceful Change without Democracy: The Case of the Sino-Soviet Security Community

  • S. Koschut
  • Political Science
    MGIMO Review of International Relations
  • 2019
Some scholars have claimed that democratic regime type needs to be treated as a necessary precondition for the formation of a pluralistic security community. This essay argues that one should not

Democratic Peace Theory and the Realist-Liberal Dichotomy: the Promise of Neoclassical Realism?

The idea of a separate (dyadic) peace among (liberal) democracies remains an alluring proposition for Western intellectuals and policy makers, despite criticism from non-Western circles. We contend

Cantankerous Cooperation: Democracies, Authoritarian Regimes, and the Prisoner's Dilemma

One of the most important debates in the field of international relations is over the effect of regime type on militarized conflict. This debate, however, has rarely extended to how regime type

Disputes, Democracies, and Dependencies: A Reexamination of the Kantian Peace

Militarized interstate disputes are widely thought to be less likely among democratic countries that have high levels of trade and extensive participation in international organizations. We reexamine

The Path to American Intervention in the First World War: Implications for Understanding the Foreign Policy Choices of Democratic States

This essay contributes to the democratic peace debates by developing observable expectations about the foreign policy choices of democratic states from a range of theoretical perspective within the

Letting Go Without a Fight: Decolonization, Democracy and War, 1900—94

Does the type of regime really make no difference to the likelihood of violent conflict over basic issues of stateness such as separatism and decolonization? Can democratic peace theory be

Emergency Powers in Democracies and International Conflict

Scholars argue that institutions in democracies constrain leaders and prevent international conflict. However, many democracies specify rules of governance in times of emergency that divert

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES

The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory

Democratic peace theory is probably the most powerful liberal contribution to the debate on the causes of war and peace. In this paper I examine the causal logics that underpin the theory to

Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises

This article explores the effect of domestic political competition on the escalation of international crises. It combines an incomplete information model of crisis bargaining with a simple model of

Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy

1. Introduction Part I. Theory: 2. Information and signalling in international crises 3. Democratic politics in international crises 4. Domestic competition and signalling in international crises

Fighting for Survival

This article examines how the postdefeat fate of leaders of different regimes affects their incentives to end or continue a losing war and how the outcome of war interacts with regime type to affect

The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics

This book offers a comprehensive overview of the structure, strategy and methods of assessment of orthodox theoretical economics. In Part I Professor Hausman explains how economists theorise,

The Surprising Logic of Transparency

The spread of information across borders is now possible on an unprecedented scale. Thanks to satellites, the Internet, and 24-hour news coverage, we have more up-to-the-minute news about other

Equilibrium Behavior in Crisis Bargaining Games

This paper analyzes a general model of two-player bargaining in the shadow of war, where one player possesses private information concerning the expected benefits of war. I derive conclusions about

Collected Works of John Stuart Mill

Born in London in 1806 into a pedigree of intellect, and educated at the knee of his father, the Scottish philosopher James Mill, John Stuart Mill became one of the 19th century's most influential

Causal Laws and Effective Strategies

There are at least two kinds of laws of nature: laws of association and causal laws.1 Laws of association are the faimilar laws with which philosophers usually deal. These laws tell how often two

Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy: Index