Privacy in implementation

@article{Gradwohl2018PrivacyII,
  title={Privacy in implementation},
  author={Ronen Gradwohl},
  journal={Social Choice and Welfare},
  year={2018},
  volume={50},
  pages={547-580}
}
In most implementation frameworks, agents care only about the outcome and not at all about the way in which it was obtained. Additionally, typical mechanisms for full implementation involve the complete revelation of all private information to the planner. In this paper I consider the problem of full implementation with agents who may prefer to protect their privacy. I analyze the extent to which privacy-protecting mechanisms can be constructed under various assumptions about agents… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Subgame Perfect Implementation : A Necessary and Almost Sufficient Condition

DILIP ABREU Haruard Uniuersit
2003
View 20 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality *

View 10 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

On the optimality of privacy in sequential contracting

J. Economic Theory • 2006
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Monopoly with Resale ∗

View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Psychological games and sequential rationality

J. Geanakoplos, D. Pearce, E. Stacchetti
Games and Economic Behavior, • 1989
View 1 Excerpt
Highly Influenced

Subgame perfect implementation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1191–1220

J. Moore, R. Repullo
1988
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Selling Privacy at Auction

Games and Economic Behavior • 2015
View 1 Excerpt

Nash implementation with partially honest individuals

Games and Economic Behavior • 2012
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…