Privacy, Anonymity, and Perceived Risk in Open Collaboration: A Study of Tor Users and Wikipedians

@article{Forte2017PrivacyAA,
  title={Privacy, Anonymity, and Perceived Risk in Open Collaboration: A Study of Tor Users and Wikipedians},
  author={Andrea Forte and Nazanin Andalibi and Rachel Greenstadt},
  journal={Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing},
  year={2017}
}
This qualitative study examines privacy practices and concerns among contributors to open collaboration projects. We collected interview data from people who use the anonymity network Tor who also contribute to online projects and from Wikipedia editors who are concerned about their privacy to better understand how privacy concerns impact participation in open collaboration projects. We found that risks perceived by contributors to open collaboration projects include threats of surveillance… 

Tables from this paper

Privacy, Anonymity, and Perceived Risk in Open Collaboration: A Study of Service Providers

This two-part qualitative study examines the challenges perceived by open collaboration service providers in allowing anonymous contributions to their projects and explores misalignment between policies aiming to serve contributors and the privacy practices of contributors themselves.

A Forensic Qualitative Analysis of Contributions to Wikipedia from Anonymity Seeking Users

A dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia is used to uncover the character of Tor users' contributions and points to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.

Privacy Research with Marginalized Groups

A literature review of papers on privacy and marginalization published between 2010-2020 across HCI, Communication, and Privacy-focused venues and introduces the Privacy Responses and Costs framework to describe the tensions around protecting privacy in marginalized contexts.

Privacy Research with Marginalized Groups: What We Know, What's Needed, and What's Next

A literature review of papers on privacy and marginalization published between 2010–2020 across HCI, Communication, and Privacy-focused venues makes three main contributions: key themes in existing work are identified and the Privacy Responses and Costs framework is introduced.

Effects of Anonymity on Comment Persuasiveness in Wikipedia Articles for Deletion Discussions

This study focuses on Wikipedia Articles for Deletion discussions as an example of online collaborative communities to study the relationship between anonymity and persuasiveness in this context and finds that in Wikipedia AfD discussions, more identifiable users tend to be more persuasive.

Disclosure, Privacy, and Stigma on Social Media

It is shown that the Disclosure Decision-Making (DDM) framework introduced in prior work explaining disclosures when they do occur, also explains non-disclosure decisions on social media.

Anonymity, User Engagement, Quality, and Trolling on Q&A Sites

It is found that highly sensitive questions are more likely to be asked anonymously and allowing anonymity does not affect answer quality and only has a weak, negative indirect effect on engagement.

"It was a shady HIT": Navigating Work-Related Privacy Concerns on MTurk

Survey of Amazon Mechanical Turk workers finds that many comply with privacy-invasive information requests for a range of reasons, including benefits outweighing costs, fears of losing access to work, and contributing to scientific research.

"People Are Either Too Fake or Too Real": Opportunities and Challenges in Tie-Based Anonymity

It is shown that while users are more comfortable in self-disclosure, they still have specific practices and strategies to avoid or allow identification, and participants come to expect both negativity and support in response to posts.

Social Support, Reciprocity, and Anonymity in Responses to Sexual Abuse Disclosures on Social Media

It is argued that anonymity is an essential factor in designing social technologies that facilitate support seeking and provision in socially stigmatized contexts, and implications for social media site design are provided.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES

Why do people seek anonymity on the internet?: informing policy and design

A key finding of this research is the very large variation in interviewees' past experiences and life situations leading them to seek anonymity, and how they tried to achieve it.

Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices

An instrument that identifies and measures the primary dimensions of individuals' concers about organizational information privacy practices, and was rigorously tested and validated across several heterogenous populations, providing a high degree of confidence in the scales' validity, reliability, and generalizability.

Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences

Results from a questionnaire of over 400 Internet users, focusing specifically on Facebook and those users who have left the service, show the lack of a clear, binary distinction between use and non-use and reveal numerous complex and interrelated motivations and justifications.

Understanding Social Media Disclosures of Sexual Abuse Through the Lenses of Support Seeking and Anonymity

This paper uses mixed methods to understand abuse-related posts on reddit and uses quantitative methods to investigate the use of "throwaway" accounts, which provide greater anonymity, and reports on factors associated with support seeking and first-time disclosures.

Chilling Effects: Online Surveillance and Wikipedia Use

This article discusses the results of the first empirical study providing evidence of regulatory “chilling effects” of Wikipedia users associated with online government surveillance. The study

What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity

This article identifies a number of major rationales and contexts for anonymity and identifiability and suggests a principle of truth in the nature of naming, which holds that those who use pseudonyms on the Internet in personal communications have an obligation to indicate they are doing so.

The challenges surrounding the regulation of anonymous communication provision in the United Kingdom

Managing deviant behavior in online communities

This panel brings together experts from media theory, computer- supported collaborative learning (CSCL), computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW), and online entertainment to explore current issues in this complex research area.

Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world

A model of privacy as a dynamic, dialectic process is outlined, and three tensions that govern interpersonal privacy management in everyday life are discussed, and these are used to explore select technology case studies drawn from the research literature.

Do You See What I See? Differential Treatment of Anonymous Users

This study methodically enumerate and characterize, in the context of Tor, the treatment of anonymous users as second-class Web citizens, and develops a methodology to distinguish censorship events from incidental failures such as those caused by packet loss or network outages.