Priority monism and part/whole dependence

  title={Priority monism and part/whole dependence},
  author={Alex Steinberg},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  • A. Steinberg
  • Published 1 August 2015
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
Priority monism is the view that the cosmos is the only independent concrete object. The paper argues that, pace its proponents, Priority monism is in conflict with the dependence of any whole on any of its parts: if the cosmos does not depend on its parts, neither does any smaller composite. 

On the Necessity of Priority Monism

Prioritymonism is thedoctrine that there is only onebasic object. Prioritymonists often take this to be ametaphysically necessary thesis. I explore the consequences ofmodalizing the priority monist

Priority monism, dependence and fundamentality

Priority monism (PM) is roughly the view that the universe is the only fundamental object, that is, a concrete object that does not depend on any other concrete object. Schaffer, the main advocate of

What is priority monism?

In a series papers, Jonathan Schaffer defended priority monism, the thesis that the cosmos is the only fundamental material object, on which all other objects depend. A primitive notion of dependence

Priority monism and essentiality of fundamentality: a reply to Steinberg

Steinberg has recently proposed an argument against Schaffer’s priority monism. The argument assumes the principle of Necessity of Monism, which states that if priority monism is true, then it is

Weak Priority Monism : a new theory of the fundamental

In this PhD dissertation, I am defending a new version of Priority Monism, which I call Weak Priority Monism: that the Cosmos is fundamental and is identical to the collective plurality of its proper

Monism, Spinoza’s Way

Monism, characterized by Jonathan Schaffer as the thesis that the cosmos is the one and only basic actual concrete object, has been the subject of a great deal of recent interest. Spinoza is often

Priority monism

Philosophy Compass. 2017;12:e12458. Abstract According to priority monism, there are many concrete entities and there is one, the cosmos, that is ontologically

Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime

I will defend two claims. First, Schaffer’s priority monism is in tension with many research programs in quantum gravity. Second, priority monism can be modified into a view more amenable to this

Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime

Abstract I will defend two claims. First, Schaffer’s priority monism is in tension with many research programs in quantum gravity. Second, priority monism can be modified into a view more amenable to

Monism, Spacetime, and Aristotelian Substances

Schaffer offers us in the last section of “On What Grounds What” (2009) an applied illustration of his allegedly Aristotelian metaontological position. According to this illustration, Schaffer’s



The Action of the Whole

I discuss an argument for the monistic idea that the cosmos is the one and only fundamental thing, drawing on the idea that the cosmos is the one and only thing that evolves by the fundamental laws.

Monism: The Priority of the Whole

Consider a circle and a pair of its semicircles. Which is prior, the whole or its parts? Are the semicircles dependent abstractions from their whole, or is the circle a derivative construction from

The Internal Relatedness of All Things

The argument from internal relatedness was one of the major nineteenth century neo-Hegelian arguments for monism. This argument has been misunderstood, and may even be sound. The argument, as I

The least discerning and most promiscuous truthmaker

I argue that the one and only truthmaker is the world. This view can be seen as arising from (i) the view that truthmaking is a relation of grounding holding between true propositions and fundamental

Spacetime the one substance

What is the relation between material objects and spacetime regions? Supposing that spacetime regions are one sort of substance, there remains the question of whether or not material objects are a

Parts. A Study in Ontology

Although the relationship of part to whole is one of the most fundamental there is, this is the first full-length study of this key concept. Showing that mereology, or the formal theory of part and

A Certain Kind of Trinity: Dependence, Substance, Explanation

The main contribution of this paper is a novel account of ontological dependence. While dependence is often explained in terms of modality and existence, there are relations of dependence that slip

Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction

This essay is a plea for ideological toleration. Philosophers are right to be fussy about the words they use, especially in metaphysics where bad vocabulary has been a source of grief down through

In defense of global supervenience

In recent years many philosophers have defended nonreductive materialism. According to this view, the special sciences are irreducible to physics even though all non-physical facts are determined by

Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality

Grounding: an opinionated introduction Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder 1. Guide to ground Kit Fine 2. Scepticism about grounding Chris Daly 3. A clarification and defense of the notion of