Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics

  title={Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics},
  author={Mora Maldonado and Benjamin Spector and Emmanuel Chemla},
  journal={Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
Abstract Structural priming is a powerful method to inform linguistic theories. We argue that this method extends nicely beyond syntax to theories of meaning. Priming, however, should still be seen as only one of the tools available for linguistic data collection. Specifically, because priming can occur at different, potentially conflicting levels, it cannot detect every aspect of linguistic representations. 

Edinburgh Research Explorer Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming

Sentences such as The bags are light allow both collective (they are light together ) and distributive interpretations (empheach bag is light). We report the results of two experiments showing that

Understanding semantic ambiguities : an experimental perspective

This dissertation informs theories of language comprehension by exploring two complementary questions: how are different meanings associated to a single sentence form, and how are the authors able to access and compute these alternative interpretations during parsing.



Shared and distinct mechanisms in deriving linguistic enrichment

Using Structural Priming to Study Scopal Representations and Operations

The universal interpretation in (2a) is surface scope: the scopal relation between the universal quantifier every and the existential quantifier a matches the order and hierarchy in which they appear

Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals

Some of the basic intuitions behind the system LPM, the logic of plurals and mass terms, as it is described in Link (1983), are reviewed.

How Do People Construct Logical Form During Language Comprehension?

It is suggested that people construct logical-form representations, and they do so after constructing meaning-based representations involving quantifiers and thematic-role information.

Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences

This paper justifies and generalizes Groenendijk and Stokhof’s (1984) formalization of exhaustive interpretation such that it can also account for implicatures that are triggered in subclauses not entailed by the whole complex sentence.

The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different

10: Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean Reasoning

Chierchia (2002) presents a solution based on a recursive interpretation function which computes 'strengthened meanings' in tandem with the interpretation function that computes 'literal meanings.