Primate hearing from a mammalian perspective.

@article{Heffner2004PrimateHF,
  title={Primate hearing from a mammalian perspective.},
  author={Rickye S. Heffner},
  journal={The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology},
  year={2004},
  volume={281 1},
  pages={
          1111-22
        }
}
  • R. Heffner
  • Published 1 November 2004
  • Biology, Physics
  • The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology
This review discusses hearing performance in primates and selective pressures that may influence it. The hearing sensitivity and sound-localization abilities of primates, as indicated by behavioral tests, are reviewed and compared to hearing and sound localization among mammals in general. Primates fit the mammalian pattern with small species hearing higher frequencies than larger species in order to use spectral/intensity cues for sound localization. In this broader comparative context, the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Primate Peripheral Auditory System and the Evolution of Primate Hearing
The primate peripheral auditory organ closely resembles that of other terrestrial mammals. Acoustic communication has an important role in primate communities, and hearing characteristics are
Primate Audition: Reception, Perception, and Ecology
The auditory system of nonhuman primates shows evidence of many similarities to humans, such as specializations for the processing of vocalizations overall, processing species-specific vocalizations
Correlations between auditory structures and hearing sensitivity in non‐human primates
TLDR
The results demonstrate that a variety of auditory structures show significant correlations with certain aspects of hearing (particularly low‐frequency sensitivity), and these relationships agree with expectations from auditory theory, but some traditional ideas were not supported.
A comparison of hearing and auditory functioning between dogs and humans
TLDR
Only with a more complete understanding of the dogs’ hearing ability compared with their own can the authors more fully appreciate perceptual and associated cognitive differences between the species alongside behavioral differences that might occur when they are exposed to a given soundscape.
Primate Hearing and Communication
TLDR
This volume presents a comprehensive review of nonhuman primate audition and vocal communication to bridge these closely related topics that are often addressed separately and is likely to provide new insights into these related topics.
Auditory sensitivity of the tufted capuchin (Sapajus apella), a test of allometric predictions.
TLDR
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) method is used to assess auditory sensitivity in four tufted capuchins (Sapajus apella), a large monkey with a large interaural distance, and the 60-dB high-frequency limit of S. apella is substantially lower than 44.7 kHz, the value predicted by the allometric model.
Social drive and the evolution of primate hearing
TLDR
This work uses the auditory brainstem response method to generate the largest number of standardized audiograms available for any primate radiation and develops and test a model of social drive, hypothesizing that social complexity has favoured enhanced hearing sensitivities, especially at higher frequencies.
What Do Primates Hear? A Meta-analysis of All Known Nonhuman Primate Behavioral Audiograms
TLDR
The degree to which one can directly compare the audiograms is sought by examining several factors: the behavioral conditioning procedure employed to train and test the subjects, the type of transducer used to deliver the test tones, the procedure used to calibrate the amplitude of the testtones, the acoustic enclosure used to minimize ambient noise, and the method used to determine the final threshold values.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 63 REFERENCES
Degenerate hearing and sound localization in naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber), with an overview of central auditory structures
TLDR
The fact that subterranean mammals have little use for vision in a lightless environment suggests that naked mole rats represent an extreme case in this relationship and may explain the fact that, unlike surface‐dwelling mammals, they have virtually lost the ability to localize brief sounds.
Visual factors in sound localization in mammals
TLDR
Evidence is presented that a major factor in sound localization is the need to direct the field of best vision to a sound source for further scrutiny, and species with broad fields of best sight require less accurate information regarding the location of a sound sources than do species with very narrow fields ofbest vision.
The evolution of human hearing.
Five descriptive parameters of hearing—high‐frequency and low‐frequency sensitivity, lowest threshold. best frequency, and area of the audible field—are compared statistically, first, among mammals
Evolution of Sound Localization in Mammals
TLDR
The ability to locate the source of a sound too brief to be either scanned or tracked using head or pinna movements is of obvious advantage to an animal, and the need to localize sound has been implicated as a primary source of selective pressure in the evolution of mammalian hearing.
Comparison of auditory functions in the chimpanzee and human.
  • S. Kojima
  • Biology, Psychology
    Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology
  • 1990
TLDR
Chimpanzees were more sensitive than humans to frequencies higher than 8 kHz but less sensitive to frequencies lower than 250 Hz and 2- to 4-kHz tones.
Hearing in mammals: the least weasel
TLDR
The high- frequencies hearing ability of the least weasel lends additional support to the relationship between functional interaural distance and high-frequency hearing, whereas its sensitivity to low frequencies in the absence of obvious morphological specialization of the middle ear makes the leastWeasel unusual among small mammals.
Absolute auditory thresholds in three Old World monkey species (Cercopithecus aethiops, C. neglectus, Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens).
TLDR
Vervets, which have the smallest interaural distance of the species that the authors tested, exhibited the greatest high-frequency sensitivity, which is consistent with Masterton, Heffner, and Ravizza's (1969) observations that head size and high- frequencies are inversely correlated in mammals.
Hearing in Transitional Mammals: Predictions from the Middle-Ear Anatomy and Hearing Capabilities of Extant Mammals
TLDR
When the ancestors of terrestrial vertebrates moved from a water to a land environment they were confronted with the problem of sensing airborne sounds, and the development of middle ears enabled more efficient collection of acoustic power from the air and transmission of the collected power to the inner ear.
...
...