Prevention of foot ulcers in the at‐risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review

@article{vanNetten2020PreventionOF,
  title={Prevention of foot ulcers in the at‐risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review},
  author={Jaap J. van Netten and Anita M Raspovic and Lawrence A. Lavery and Matilde Monteiro-Soares and Anne Rasmussen and Isabel C. N. Sacco and Sicco A. Bus},
  journal={Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews},
  year={2020},
  volume={36}
}
Prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes is important to help reduce the substantial burden on both patient and health resources. A comprehensive analysis of reported interventions is needed to better inform healthcare professionals about effective prevention. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of interventions to help prevent both first and recurrent foot ulcers in persons with diabetes who are at risk for this complication. We searched the… 

Reliability of the evidence to guide decision-making in foot ulcer prevention in diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews

An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions to prevent diabetes-related foot ulceration found the majority of these systematic reviews are at high risk of bias and fail to provide reliable evidence for decision-making.

The Role of Foot-Loading Factors and Their Associations with Ulcer Development and Ulcer Healing in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Low to moderate quality evidence is found that lower barefoot plantar pressure and higher footwear and device adherence associate with lower risk of ulcer development and shorter healing times, but limited for the other foot-loading factors.

A Review on Newer Interventions for the Prevention of Diabetic Foot Disease

The effectiveness of telemedicine, wearable technologies, and sensors in DFD prevention is discussed in this review and the benefits of adopting these remote monitoring approaches have been demonstrated in some studies with DFD-at-risk individuals.

Recurrence rates suggest delayed identification of plantar ulceration for patients in diabetic foot remission

Findings have potential implications for practice, particularly related to the value of telehealth and in-home monitoring of patients in diabetic foot remission, and there are implications for study design, which should consider the impact of interval censoring.

Treatment of modifiable risk factors for foot ulceration in persons with diabetes: a systematic review

Effectiveness of interventions in ulcer prevention has been systematically reviewed, but their effectiveness in improving modifiable risk factors is unknown.

Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial.

This trial contributes to the evidence about the value of mHealth in preventing diabetes foot ulcers by comparing incidence of DFUs in the thermometry plus mobile health reminders intervention arm vs. thermometry-only control arm.

Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial

In this study, conducted in a low-income setting, the addition of mHealth to foot thermometry was not effective in reducing foot ulceration.

Dryness of Foot Skin Assessed by the Visual Indicator Test and Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: A Prospective Observational Study

Dryness of foot skin assessed by the visual indicator plaster method predicts the development of DFU, and the IPM can be included in the screening methods for identification of patients at risk for DFU.

Research on lower extremity health in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic scoping review

To analyse empirical studies and their evidence on lower extremity health in patients with MS, in order to identify the need for future studies in key areas, a systematic scoping review was conducted.

Diabetic foot.

Effective follow-up of patients and application of preventive approaches such as using of appropriate shoes and foot care can reduce the incidence of ulcerations by up to 50 %.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 119 REFERENCES

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.

There is insufficient robust evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence, and future research should focus on evaluating the effect of more comprehensive and/or intensive prevention strategies which may also include patient education (complex interventions.

Complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.

No high quality research evidence evaluating complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration is found and insufficient evidence of benefit is found.

Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)

This guideline is on the prevention of foot ulceration in persons with diabetes and updates the 2015 IWGDF prevention guideline and follows the GRADE methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the PICO format.

Prevention of foot ulcers in the at‐risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent first and recurrent foot ulcers in persons with diabetes who are at risk for ulceration.

Beyond the Monofilament for the Insensate Diabetic Foot

Of all methods proposed to prevent diabetic foot ulcers, only foot temperature-guided avoidance therapy was found beneficial in RCTs, although this needs to be validated in other populations.

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS).

Risk assessment procedures that can reliably inform national and international diabetes clinical guideline foot risk assessment procedures are identified and a clinical prediction rule (CPR) is proposed using the following predictor variables: insensitivity to a 10-g monofilament, absent pedal pulses and a history of ulceration or lower-extremities amputations.

A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable

It is argued that a shift in priorities is needed in diabetic foot care, and a new target is set to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%.

Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

There was no evidence that this programme of targeted education was associated with clinical benefit in this population when compared with usual care, and the usefulness and optimal delivery of education to such a high-risk group requires further evaluation.

Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review

The quality of evidence for these risk stratification systems is low, as little validation of their predictive ability has been done, and the number of included variables in each model and risk groups varied greatly.
...