Prevalence of gastroschisis at birth: retrospective study.

Abstract

having patients re-evaluated 24 hours after admission, as change in symptoms and signs can be an important adjunct in diagnosis. This was arguably both a strength and a weakness. One weakness was the possibility for confounding factors—seven patients receiving early computed tomography underwent other radiological investigations and 13 patients receiving standard practice underwent off-study or delayed computed tomography. No differences emerged in the results between the intention to treat and as treated analyses. Limiting the study to weekends may have influenced referral patterns, timeliness of investigations, and clinical decision making. The most likely reason for the non-significance of the results of our main outcome measures is that our study was underpowered, being based on a difference in length of hospital stay of 1.5 days.

Statistics

0204060'04'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

71 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 71 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Tanna2002PrevalenceOG, title={Prevalence of gastroschisis at birth: retrospective study.}, author={Gian luca Di Tanna and Aldo Rosano and Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo}, journal={BMJ}, year={2002}, volume={325 7377}, pages={1389-90} }