Pretrial Drug Testing: Panacea or Pandora's Box?

@article{Visher1992PretrialDT,
  title={Pretrial Drug Testing: Panacea or Pandora's Box?},
  author={Christy A. Visher},
  journal={The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year={1992},
  volume={521},
  pages={112 - 131}
}
  • Christy A. Visher
  • Published 1 May 1992
  • Law
  • The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Pretrial drug testing of arrestees and defendants released before trial is increasingly being implemented in state and local criminal justice agencies. The federal courts are also considering whether pretrial drug testing should be initiated in each district. But researchers and policymakers are currently engaged in a vigorous debate about the merits and drawbacks of pretrial drug-testing programs. Critics contend that the programs are difficult to implement, are too expensive, and have little… 
Drug testing in the USA: A policy for maximising harm
Its stated goal is to reduce the number of drug users by threatening them with exposure and sanctioning. Positive drug tests lead to imprisonment, loss of employment, loss of custody of children,
Predicting pretrial misconduct with drug tests of arrestees: Evidence from eight settings
Identifying defendants at high risk of pretrial misconduct is a major problem for the judiciary. Currently, some have argued that testing arrestees for recent drug use is one way to distinguish
Does Parolee Drug Testing Influence Employment and Education Outcomes? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Noncompliance
Despite the ubiquity of drug testing in criminal justice settings, there is little experimental evidence suggesting that testing reduces drug use or engenders pro-social behavior. This paper
On-Site Testing Devices in the Criminal Justice System
The prevalence of drug use by those under supervision in the criminal justice system is alarmingly high. Current (1998) data from the U. S. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Monitoring program (ADAM, replacing
SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT OF Co-OCCURRING DISORDERS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
This publication is an update of a monograph first published in 1997. It was developed with support from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Mental
DRUG TESTING IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SETTINGS
A safe or safety storage apparatus is mounted for vertical up and down movement above and below a concrete slab. An actuator is provided to effect the movement and a lock is provided to hold the

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES
Drug use and pretrial misconduct in New York city
Is recent drug use significantly associated with pretrial misconduct? Does consideration of recent drug use enhance risk classification among a sample of persons who have time free pending the
A survival model of pretrial failure
This paper examines the likelihood of rearrest during the pretrial period with a model that depends on both time elapsed since release and on individual and case characteristics. Using data on a
Drug testing in the workplace--are methods legally defensible? A survey of experts, arbitrators, and testing laboratories.
TLDR
Evaluating the legal defensibility of the methods used for drug testing, a survey of technical experts, testing laboratories, and arbitrators found that Arbitrators had considerable experience in drug use cases and understood the critical role of urinalysis results, but were unable to distinguish legal defENSibility of analytical methods.